"or we would have LENR occurring everywhere around us where ever we have large magnetic fields"
I think we do have LENR occuring around us. Strong magnetic fields occur before/during earthquakes, after CMEs/geomagnetic storms, during severe weather, etc. We just call it different things because we are human. On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Axil, > > You present a credible theory that connects the dots nicely with > supporting citations. Your statements may have been a little to mater of > fact for some of your audience who would have you state everything unproven > as only your opinion but your arguments were clear and persuasive.. > although I would suggest a little more illumination on the contribution of > the NAE WRT virtual photons / relativistic frames or we would have LENR > occurring everywhere around us where ever we have large magnetic fields. I > also liked your comment [snip]At this juncture, it is not clear how much > magnetic energy is required to keep a gainful fusion reaction going[/snip] > .. I think there are many methods that will agitate the “water” spill over > the columb “ glass” ..My bet is that the breakthrough will come from > constraint of seemingly unrelated properties like the loading of hydrogen > [PV/T] AND microwave radiation AND also tungsten heating filaments and > even mechanical vibration of the bulk powder. All in various combinations > in a shotgun search for synergy.. My point is that we are trying to confine > virtual particles [ the quick silver of quicksilver] we see from SR that it > is a game of extremes at the macro scale requiring near C velocities and I > am suggesting that even this opposite method of confinement in the NAE is > still going to be a game of extremes unless we can mix metaphors to nail > down the …dare I call it the “viscosity” of virtual particles using > different parameters. Tesla claimed that high voltage tries to > slow/solidify the ether so perhaps I should throw that out there as yet > another variable to ply. My hope is that you can use one mechanism to hold > it while using another to hit it such that you escape the requirement for > extremis. > > Just my 2 cents > > Fran > > > > >
