although I would suggest a little more illumination on the contribution of
the NAE WRT virtual photons / relativistic frames or we would have LENR
occurring everywhere around us where ever  we have large magnetic fields.

It takes a very special type of magnetic field. It takes an anapole
magnetic field. A focused magnetic beam negates the dilution of the inverse
square law. A vortex current or plasmid is the path that spin particles
must follow to produce anapole magnetic field and achieve the LENR effect.


On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Roarty, Francis X <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  Axil,
>
> You present a credible theory that connects the dots nicely with
> supporting citations. Your statements may have been a little to mater of
> fact for some of your audience who would have you state everything unproven
> as only your opinion but your arguments were clear and persuasive..
> although I would suggest a little more illumination on the contribution of
> the NAE WRT virtual photons / relativistic frames or we would have LENR
> occurring everywhere around us where ever  we have large magnetic fields. I
> also liked your comment [snip]At this juncture, it is not clear how much
> magnetic energy is required to keep a gainful fusion reaction going[/snip]
> .. I think there are many  methods that will agitate the “water” spill over
> the columb “ glass” ..My bet is that the breakthrough will come from
> constraint of seemingly unrelated properties like the loading of hydrogen
> [PV/T] AND microwave radiation  AND also  tungsten heating filaments and
> even mechanical vibration of the bulk powder. All in various combinations
> in a shotgun search for synergy.. My point is that we are trying to confine
> virtual particles [ the quick silver of quicksilver] we see from SR that it
> is a game of extremes at the macro scale requiring near C velocities and I
> am suggesting that even this opposite method of confinement in the NAE is
> still going to be a game of extremes unless we can mix metaphors to nail
> down the …dare I call it the  “viscosity” of virtual particles using
> different parameters. Tesla claimed that high voltage tries to
> slow/solidify the ether so perhaps I should throw that out there as yet
> another variable to ply. My hope is that you can use one mechanism to hold
> it while using another to hit it such that you escape the requirement for
> extremis.
>
> Just my 2 cents
>
> Fran
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to