Jones, Good Points, It brings up the question of how to differentiate between transmutation and faux transmutation.. we may be knee deep in faux transmutation all around us and unaware of how to detect the difference.. a technology that could make one element look like the next element over by adding or subtracting DDL hydrogen would be worth a fortune regardless of LENR viability. The host elements’ need to have a lattice and geometry which supports DDL hydrogen will obviously limit the candidates BUT, any commercial goals that require concentration and control of DDL hydrogen will produce theory and techniques also appropriate for LENR as byproducts. Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:LENR <-> dark mater <-> DDL connection Another wild thought on nuclear “faux-transmutation.” If a DDL can displace an inner electron of some elements (K or L shell) then the resultant species will possibly react chemically as if it was the next element to the right in the periodic table, even if there has been no “real” nuclear transmutation. There could be differences, but basically if nickel were to bind with a DDL in an inner orbital, then the resultant species NiH* (where H* is a DDL) would look like copper. Perhaps it would not look exactly like copper but it could be similar enough to fool many instruments and possibly would be copper-colored instead of silvery. The H* could possibly displace one electron’s average position in a p-orbital of an L shell and be held there magnetically. What are the objections to that ? (other than that it is shockingly at odds with the mainstream). …And lest we forget the amazing claims of Louis Kervran in biological transmutation, it should be noted that CaCO3 (as a transmutation product for chicken eggs) has a notable signature in its 3.7 keV fluorescent X-ray line. The latter is possibly unrelated… if one believes in truly random coincidences. If it is not coincidental, then the DDL slant on this reaction (which basic reaction was verified by several groups) is that poultry Hens which are calcium deprived, as in the experiments, but had lots of potassium in their diets – were able to make the normal number of eggs by converting potassium-39 into calcium-40. This could arguably happen by a biological mechanism which first created a DDL. Then this DDL either fused with the K ++OR++ was merely chemically bound displacing an inner electron, so that it reacted chemically like calcium to form eggs shells. IOW there was no nuclear reaction, but the KH*CO3 acts exactly as if it was CaCO3 (where H* is DDL). The same spectral line from calcium even shows up from the substitute, which makes detection more difficult. Bizarre. This is not the kind of evidence which anyone would want to use in support of the DDL however. (unless the audience is vortex) Jones
