I can see that you and jojo are gonna be fast friends... assuming that you aren't already his "famous" pen pal. It's good to see someone with a classic physics background on the board. But how is the Grand Unified Theory a "novel" theory in physics? http://www.linkedin.com/in/hermansoneric
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Eric Hermanson <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil, I don’t believe your question is valid. What Mills has done is > derive a set of equations based on electronic transitions that have nothing > to do with muons, or even coupling to muons. The question you ask is no > better than, “has Mills accounted for ‘grapes' causing fractional orbital > behavior”. The classical force balance equations describing the initial, > intermediate, and final states are all defined, and the transition > mechanism is clearly defined. I’m not sure where you’re going with > muons... are you attempting to raise the subject of muon catalyzed fusion > or something akin to that? > > - Eric > > > > On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > That theoretical explanation is what it may look like, but it is near > impossible to tell what is happening in subatomic particles. CERN has > spent billions of dollars to find out what subatomic particles are doing in > detail. As a result, Many early theories of particle physics have been > incorrect and revised over decades. > > Has Mills ever put in the effort to see if muons were causing the > experimental results that he thinks is causing fractional orbital behavior. > > If he has, please site the references. > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Eric Hermanson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hydrino transitions regard resonant energy transfers that depend on >> multiples of the potential energy of Hydrogen, 27.2 eV (one Hartree), where >> the potential energy of Hydrogen is due to the proton and its bound >> electron alone. See Chapter 5, specifically. The Introduction is also a >> good primer. >> >> - Eric >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Can you be kind enough to site the relevant passage by extracting that >> material here in the reply to this email? >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Eric Hermanson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, in Volume I: >>> >>> >>> http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/book/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 19, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Has Mills ever proved that the experimental observations he has used to >>> support factional orbital states are due to electrons? This states may be >>> the result of muon capture by atoms. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Eric Hermanson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Thu Aug 14, 2014, Beene, Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> > In posts yesterday you have raised a number of good observations - >>>> and there >>>> > is a bit more information floating around cyberspace this week about >>>> the >>>> > putative single Dirac (KG) ground state, which can refine the idea of >>>> a >>>> > stable fractional state for LENR, which is also the identical state >>>> of dark >>>> > matter. Thus - a new subject heading, as this is not Mills territory >>>> > anymore. >>>> >>>> Clearly you’re joking. Mills introduced the Hydrino to physics in >>>> 1988, a solid 10 years prior to the DDL presentation you refer to, and a >>>> solid 5 years prior to the first DDL paper. Furthermore, Mills identified >>>> dark matter as the Hydrino circa 1990. Attempts to re-write history don’t >>>> work. Even without the Internet keeping tabs… >>>> >>>> Also, for the correct explanation of the “newly” discovered 3.5 keV >>>> astronomical line, see: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Chapter-5_3.5_keV_feature.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> - Eric >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
