Looong time ago, I builttest equipment, employedby AAB. I never saw or heard of any thing not possible to measure or control. Sometimes it took time tofind out the hooks and occasionally one picked wrong but it ws correctable . I assume that is still true. (Semiconductors) On Aug 19, 2014 5:58 PM, "Axil Axil" <[email protected]> wrote:
> DGT revealed that even with a double Fariday shield, the reactor took out > the phone system in the building that there test was held in. > > It is the same for the Rossi reactor. All the tests that Rossi ran before > the sale of his IP is suspect as flawed, IMHO. > > The Ni/H reactor must be shielded and the control system must be placed > away from RF interference, > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Jack Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wouldn't assume they have no automation, but maybe in their lab >> experiments they do not. Regardless, it should not be terribly difficult >> to build a control system. I presume he follows some kind of internal >> rules and reacts based on the rules. If he can do it manually, it could be >> systematized. >> >> Jack >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:08 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> You can control a system without knowing exactly how it functions. >>> Granted, it would be easier if you had a perfect handle upon it, but that >>> is not required provided you know how it behaves to control stimuli. Of >>> course, I am assuming it is possible to control the animal in some manner. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Terry Blanton <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 7:45 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:No automatic control system? >>> >>> It's due to not understanding how the reactor actually works. >>> >>> >>> >> >
