what option?
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The option is that Rossi would allow that new to leak. Rossi runs a tight > ship. > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> There are plenty of vultures surrounding Rossi. If such a thing happened >> or does happen, you'll hear about it. >> >> a matter of opinion >> ***Does this mean you'll be backtracking from your earlier, stronger >> statement of "When a Rossi reactor melts down, the reactor goes to 2000C >> and when the hydrogen explodes, it send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal >> and plasma in all directions and for a long distance." >> >> That's far different from "When a Rossi reactor Possibly Might Melt Down, >> the reactor Could go to 2000C and (IF THE Hydrogen Doesn't Escape >> Beforehand -- which is quite likely ) when the hydrogen Conceivably >> explodes, it Could send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal and plasma in >> all directions and Even Possibly for a long distance." >> >> That's a bit like quoting the most drastic case of gasoline catching on >> fire in automobile collisions. >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> *It Probably Would Have been reported if it DID happen,* >>> >>> Yes, it is a matter of opinion. But I am sure that if it does happen, >>> you won't hear about the explosion from Rossi. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> There's quite a difference between asking what Will Happen and saying >>>> that such & such thing DOES Happen. >>>> >>>> I'm saying such & such a thing Hasn't Been Reported. It Probably Would >>>> Have been reported if it DID happen, so I'm stretching the inductive >>>> reasoning to It Probably Didn't Happen unless you have evidence it Did >>>> Happen rather than postulation that it Might Happen. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On meltdown, the Rossi reactor has 3 or 4 bars or may be more of >>>>> compressed 2000C hydrogen in the reaction chamber. What will happen when >>>>> that hydrogen hit the air upon reaction chamber failure? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> First I've heard of such a thing. The meltdowns I've heard about >>>>>> have simply been that: meltdowns, not explosions. Pons & Fleischmann >>>>>> had >>>>>> theirs melt through several inches of concrete flooring. No big deal. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> When a Rossi reactor melts down, the reactor goes to 2000C and when >>>>>>> the hydrogen explodes, it send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal and >>>>>>> plasma in all directions and for a long distance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Kevin O'Malley < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually, statistical control is a reasonably strong approach. I >>>>>>>> take ethernet as an example. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 10/100 Mbit ethernet was once dominated by National Semiconductor, >>>>>>>> heavily relying on their analog background to control tightly the >>>>>>>> parameters involved. They were overtaken by a disruptive technology >>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>> DSP and statistical "control". It turned out that it made the analog >>>>>>>> simpler, and the digital side of the issue meant that die shrinking >>>>>>>> took >>>>>>>> place much faster. By the time National spent $120M buying Comcore to >>>>>>>> play >>>>>>>> catchup, their die size was 60% larger than Broadcom. The next >>>>>>>> generation >>>>>>>> was gigabit ethernet, where the vast majority of the game was with DSP >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> Marvell entered the picture. As each generation of ethernet came out, >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> was more digital, more millions of transistors doing DSP where analog >>>>>>>> used >>>>>>>> to be, and eventually it was so cheap that we now buy those chips for >>>>>>>> $2 at >>>>>>>> 1Gig/s when they were originally $45 at 0.1Gig/s >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By using a statistical approach, Rossi puts himself on the digital >>>>>>>> scaling roadmap rather than the analog scaling roadmap. It has >>>>>>>> tremendous >>>>>>>> merits. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What is the danger? If an air conditioner goes on during August >>>>>>>> when it ain't hot, what's the harm? If Rossi's device goes kaflooiee >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> the first generation, it will just stop working. By the time the 3rd >>>>>>>> generation rolls out, it will no longer go kaflooiee, and it will be >>>>>>>> under >>>>>>>> far tighter control than if he had taken the "analog" route. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Statistical control is like saying that most of the time it is hot >>>>>>>>> in august so turn on the air conditioners in august. Most of the time >>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>> are correct, but sometimes a bad thing happens. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
