Jed is write in my opinion between the deniers of global warming and the skeptic of cold fusion, in some aspects. I think the better analogy is deniers of anthropogenic global warming and the tobacco industry lobby that claimed tobacco didn't cause cancer. It took a long time for that debate to end, with the tobacco industry having to put their tail between their legs and fork out billions in lawsuits. Global warming scientists are on top of there game. The people that deny global warming on the internet blogs, comments, and forums are so foolish and look to be nothing short of butt holes with an agenda. And that agenda is to be the biggest ass that they can be if it conforms to what their buddy's think.
I just hope this subject on global warming never again appears on vortex. It's to much of an off-subject hot potato. On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > > I can serve up thousands of similar reports on cold fusion, > ***And you do. You serve up factual reports on cold fusion. And there > are thousands of factual reports on global warming. Some conclude there's > manmade warming, others conclude it's caused by the sun. Imagine that: > the sun warms up planets, like ours. There's a distinct lack of evidence > for something that is supposed to be such a friggin slam-dunk. When it is > a slam-dunk, there's no need for fraud. > > This proves only that cold fusion researchers are primates like everyone > else. > ***And so are climate researchers. On both sides. I've seen reports that > strongly correlate "global warming" with solar activity. What a huge DUHH > factor. Trying to overcome the obvious and claim that such a thing is > wrong, that there's some ton of evidence that says mankind causes global > warming... well, such a thing has a higher bar of proof now that the IPCC > was caught in an outright series of lies trying to make the case for global > warming. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> here's 2 reports to chew on. good luck digesting them. it doesn't even >>> reach back to the the fraudulent emails from ipcc yet. >>> >> >> I can serve up thousands of similar reports on cold fusion, from >> newspapers, universities, national labs, Wikipedia and a hundred other >> institutions. All of them are wrong. The authors, in every case, know >> nothing about this subject, and every assertion they make is either a >> mistake or a lie. >> >> >>> By James Delingpole – One of the world’s most eminent climate scientists >>> – for several decades a warmist – has defected to the climate sceptic camp. >>> >> I know several cold fusion researchers who gave up and denounced the >> whole file. I know several today who say that everyone else in the field is >> wrong, and that Rossi and many others are frauds. This proves only that >> cold fusion researchers are primates like everyone else. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
