Ha ha.  Deniers of global warming are so delusional.

http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2014/05/22/lomborg-hypes-already-debunked-bengtsson-story-in-new-forbes-column/


On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote:

> here's 2 reports to chew on.  good luck digesting them.  it doesn't even
> reach back to the the fraudulent emails from ipcc yet.
>
> Dishonest global warming reports are good, as long as they promote certain
> agenda, paper says
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/07/dishonest-global-warming-reports-are-good-as-long-as-they-promote-certain-agenda-paper-says/>
> By Neilio <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/author/neilio/> on July 12,
> 2014 in Bad Policy <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/bad-policy/>,
> ClimateGate <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/climategate/>,
> Corruption <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/corruption/>,
> Extremists <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/extremists/>,
> Fascism <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/fascism/>, IPCC
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/ipcc/>, Junk Science
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/junk-science/>, Science
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/science/>, World Governance
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/world-governance/>
>
> by: J. D. Heyes.  (NaturalNews) According to a pair of economists who have
> recently published a peer-reviewed paper in the American Journal of
> Agricultural Economics, lying about climate change in order to advance an
> extremist environmental agenda is a great idea.As reported by Breitbart
> News, the authors — Assistant Professors of Economics Fuhai Hong and
> Xiaojian Zhao […]
>  Continue Reading
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/07/dishonest-global-warming-reports-are-good-as-long-as-they-promote-certain-agenda-paper-says/>
> 57
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/07/dishonest-global-warming-reports-are-good-as-long-as-they-promote-certain-agenda-paper-says/#comments>
> [image: James Delingpole]
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/05/leading-climate-scientist-defects-no-longer-believes-in-the-consensus/>
>  Leading
> Climate Scientist Defects: No Longer Believes in the ‘Consensus’
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2014/05/leading-climate-scientist-defects-no-longer-believes-in-the-consensus/>
> By Dan McGrath <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/author/dan-mcgrath/> on May
> 8, 2014 in Climate History
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/climate-history/>, Failed
> predictions
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/failed-predictions/>, IPCC
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/ipcc/>, Michael Mann
> <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/michael-mann/>, Mythical
> Consensus <http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/mythical-consensus/>
>
> By James Delingpole – One of the world’s most eminent climate scientists –
> for several decades a warmist – has defected to the climate sceptic camp.
> Lennart Bengtsson – a Swedish climatologist, meteorologist, former director
> of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg and winner, in 2006,
> of the 51st IMO Prize of the […]
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> If it's all about science and scholarship then why did the IPCC get
>>> caught fraudulently changing the data when it showed a cooling trend?
>>>
>>
>> That is nonsense. It resembles assertions that cold fusion researchers
>> committed fraud. There is no fraud in global warming or cold fusion. There
>> are only experts who understand what they are doing, and ignorant critics
>> yelling "fraud."
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to