> Lots of microevolution and adaptation does not result in Macro-evolution > (change of species/kind). This distinction is important. How do you know that? And why must you maintain this distinction? Why is it important for you to keep them separate. I don't. What for?
Have you measured all those thousands of micro changes over hundreds of thousands of years and proven the contention that a species can't eventually transform into a different one? I know I'm not capable because I can't live that long, but neither can you. You seem to be implying that each micro change can never reset the center of the genetic normality of any species. But that's inaccurate. Every micro change... every micro-mutation automatically resets the center of genetic normality of the species for that particular organism. Actually, there is no way to keep a species from NOT changing over millennium. Each and every species on the planet is essentially an unstable macro-organism if one is capable of perceiving this "change" from a geological POV. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com zazzle.com/orionworks
