Eric,
These statements are in the archive so there is no need to collect them. There are many of them over the years, so there will be plenty to gloat over - if gammaless fusion is proved. My only excuse will be to say that if nuclear fusion - at low input energy, without gammas - is proved then it will consist of two simultaneous miracles. These are actually two completely separated miracles –not one which includes a subset. The first is the fusion itself, which is a strong miracle if the probability is high - and the second is a previously unknown channel for shedding the immense energy of fusion events. That second one is actually a stronger miracle then the first one. Nuclear tunneling via QM is known to happen at low probability but it always involves a gamma channel. Actually – it would be fabulous to be wrong on this point, but I am not worried in the least about that happening. Yet in November, if Mizuno backtracks and sez… oops... we had a bad meter earlier - and there really was helium, then mea culpa. From: Eric Walker Jones Beene wrote: The best explanation for lack of gammas – the only explanation needed – is lack of fusion. I'm sooo tempted to collect statements from you along these lines for future gloating. ;) Eric
