Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:

If Rossi presented his reactor to the USPTO, and let them test it, wouldn't
> that solve the issue?
> I vaguely remember they have a similar rule to free energy devices.
>

The Patent Office does not have laboratories or the authority to test
devices. I think what they demand in cases such as Swartz or Rossi is
independent proof from experts that the invention works. (I mention Swartz
because the ruling in his case is cited in the link provided in this
discussion.)

I think the two ELFORSK tests are the kind of thing the Patent Office
wants. Whether those two tests alone are sufficient I cannot say. If you
had a dozen tests like that, that would be enough, wouldn't it? I don't
know.

- Jed

Reply via email to