Typical pseudo-debunking.
The only guy in the establishment circles remotely worthy of respect was Norman Ramsey when he said even one excess heat event would be revolutionary. *"Ordinarily, new scientific discoveries are claimed to be consistent and reproducible; as a result, if the experiments are not complicated, the discovery can usually be confirmed or disproved in a few months. The claims of cold fusion, however, are unusual in that even the strongest proponents of cold fusion assert that the experiments, for unknown reasons, are not consistent and reproducible at the present time. However, even a single short but valid cold fusion period would be revolutionary." * - Dr. Norman Ramsey, Nobel laureate and professor of physics at Harvard University was the only person on the the 1989 Department of Energy cold fusion review panel to voice a dissenting opinion. Ramsey insisted on the inclusion of this preamble as an alternative to his resignation from the panel. The rest should be taken out in the parking lot and shot, including the pseudo-debunkers at Bose. On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > I fall on that message by pilgrim108 on ECW > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/10/02/mats-lewan-to-publish-second-edition-of-an-impossible-invention-following-report/#comment-1619387115 > > Bose ( the company ) claims to have had 10 people checking out cold fusion >> for 2 years in the early 90's. >> Their conclusion was that the excess heat could be explained by "a >> missing term in the calculations". >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?... >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZopU5T3IqEk> >> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/tec... >> <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/technology-topics/11138572/Bose-at-50-beyond-sound.html> > > > He found out tha Bose claimed having explain an error in cold fusion. > > when I refer to Beaudette book it is not amond the listed critiques, nor > any other I heard of (Shanahan CCS) > (NB: I could not view the video... is the a transcript) > > > http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn/lenr%20home%20page/acrobat/BeaudetteCexcessheat.pdf#page=35 > > does any have the paper on the critique, and the comments of the experts > on it's substance ? > > maybe is it simply a negative experiment, and not a debunking ? >
