ramsey approach is evident... it seems cargo cult skepticism take over some academic circle...
2014-10-04 22:58 GMT+02:00 James Bowery <[email protected]>: > Typical pseudo-debunking. > > > The only guy in the establishment circles remotely worthy of respect was > Norman Ramsey when he said even one excess heat event would be > revolutionary. > > *"Ordinarily, new scientific discoveries are claimed to be consistent and > reproducible; as a result, if the experiments are not complicated, the > discovery can usually be confirmed or disproved in a few months. The claims > of cold fusion, however, are unusual in that even the strongest proponents > of cold fusion assert that the experiments, for unknown reasons, are not > consistent and reproducible at the present time. However, even a single > short but valid cold fusion period would be revolutionary." > * > - Dr. Norman Ramsey, Nobel laureate and professor of physics at Harvard > University was the only person on the the 1989 Department of Energy cold > fusion review panel to voice a dissenting opinion. Ramsey insisted on the > inclusion of this preamble as an alternative to his resignation from the > panel. > > The rest should be taken out in the parking lot and shot, including the > pseudo-debunkers at Bose. > > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I fall on that message by pilgrim108 on ECW >> >> http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/10/02/mats-lewan-to-publish-second-edition-of-an-impossible-invention-following-report/#comment-1619387115 >> >> Bose ( the company ) claims to have had 10 people checking out cold >>> fusion for 2 years in the early 90's. >>> Their conclusion was that the excess heat could be explained by "a >>> missing term in the calculations". >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?... >>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZopU5T3IqEk> >>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/tec... >>> <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/technology-topics/11138572/Bose-at-50-beyond-sound.html> >> >> >> He found out tha Bose claimed having explain an error in cold fusion. >> >> when I refer to Beaudette book it is not amond the listed critiques, nor >> any other I heard of (Shanahan CCS) >> (NB: I could not view the video... is the a transcript) >> >> >> http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn/lenr%20home%20page/acrobat/BeaudetteCexcessheat.pdf#page=35 >> >> does any have the paper on the critique, and the comments of the experts >> on it's substance ? >> >> maybe is it simply a negative experiment, and not a debunking ? >> > >
