Jones, The transmittance of fused silica cuts off at about 150 nm, or 8.3 eV. So you cannot use a fused silica window to detect even the first f/H energy of 27 eV, let alone the 55 eV. As I said, this requires special experiments done with specially designed sensors without a window. EEPROMS were erased with about 300-450 nm UV.
Muelenberg has stated specifically that photons and phonons are bosons having angular momentum of 1 and the DDL states are l=0 and thus you cannot transfer energy between by photons and phonons. He states this in several papers, but for example see "From the Naught Orbit to the 4He Excited State" in CMNS 10 (2013) on page 20 of his paper. This is also a fundamental assertion by Mills, that energy transfer must occur without photons. That is why Mills requires a catalyst with a matched electronic energy transition to the f/H state he is trying to stimulate. The catalyst, through evanescent coupling to the H atom, sucks out the energy required for the transition without a photon exchange. Then the catalyst is free to release the energy as photon fluorescence from the excited catalyst's electron ensemble. Photons are not expected to be absorbed or released directly from the f/H atom. Bob Higgins On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob, > > > > The window is fused silica. This is obvious choice and one of very few UV > transparent materials. I’m sure you are aware that the old EPROMs used > fused quartz windows. > > > > This is essentially what Lehigh did for the Thermacore testing. > > > > X-rays do indeed expand hydrinos - which is not prohibited by Mills theory > AFAIK. Why shouldn’t they not? > > > > Can you cite your source on that? > > > > Jones > > >
