Interesting, thanks.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]>
wrote:

> There a few things I noticed in this.  First is that Rossi's powder
> appears to be less actively thermochemically processed than what I have
> first used - I.E it seems more lightly thermochemically processed.
>
> The second observation is that the reactor is not very "clean".  There
> appears to be no means to evacuate this reactor after the powder is added
> to remove the air and water vapor.  The powder is basically added and then
> it is glued shut with a refractory cement.  [Refractory cements seal by
> going through a glass and then a ceramic phase as they are heated.]  So it
> appears that the air and water are not poisons for the reaction.
>
> The third observation is that the new reactor is alumina ceramic.  This
> will allow more of the "RF" to go through.  If the reaction was creating RF
> fields, you would definitely measure them on the outside.  Further the
> resistors are now closer to the fuel.  RF excitation may simply be the
> switching transients of the triacs controlling the heat.  When triacs are
> switched ON not at zero crossings, the switch is fast and can generate a
> lot of harmonics.  Rossi seems to have optimized the ability for these
> harmonics (primarily <5kHz evanescent magnetic fields) to help excite his
> reaction.  Yet, since there is mention that the reaction will continue in
> the OFF mode (but they didn't use that), it is clear that these excitations
> are not required to sustain the reaction.
>
> Bob Higgins
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> What does that indicate about the reaction to you Bob?
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The report cites the fuel as a combination of LiAlH4 and Ni + Fe.  It
>>> appears the Ni is treated with an Fe catalyst as I surmised - this is the
>>> powder I have been working with.  The LiAlH4 means that Rossi is using a
>>> hydride supplying only H2 and not D.
>>>
>>> Bob Higgins
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to