I have one idea, linked to my pet theory (don't laugh guys, I have stolen most of it to competent people; the stupid part is my adding).
as Godes says, most of external Li must have gone. and if there was some in the powder maybe it was inside the active part, why not produced by the reaction... like the helium which is locked in the first layer of the palladium ? even if very few Li6 was produced, if most natural Li6/7 is gone, it can looks like a huge enrichment while it is tiny local production. 2014-10-13 2:28 GMT+02:00 Craig Haynie <[email protected]>: > So, Brillouin implies that they can produce a similar reaction. > > ""The before and after test results are consistent with the Brillouin > Hypothesis. It is unfortunate that there equipment only reports the stable > isotopes of Ni and they probably cut it off from Cu detection or figured > the Cu65 without any Cu63 was an erroneous reading. It is almost a > certainty that 59Ni with a half-life of 76000 years and 63Ni with ~100 year > half-life. It is also almost a certainty that the 64Ni that was present at > 0.9% turned into 65Ni which has a 2.5Hr half-life and becomes 65Cu before > the measurement took place. > > "There is no other reasonable explanation for what happened to the 64Ni > which went missing on page 29. The Li seems to have disappeared during the > test as well but this is not surprising as the boiling point of Li is 1342 > °C and it probably evaporated out of the system fairly quickly. I would > have preferred that they used a more direct measurement technique. I would > have placed the reactor inside of a tube in a pressure vessel with a > release valve set for 20 bar and measured the amount of water vaporized. > The pressure valve tells you what the temperature of the escaping water > vapor was. All this being said, this was a very convincing test proving > that the reaction is both real and nuclear in nature. Further it also > proves that there is no penetrating radiation from this type of reaction." > - Robert Godes " > > Craig > > > > On 10/12/2014 08:21 PM, H Veeder wrote: > >> Robert Godes from Brillouin comments: >> >> http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/734- >> Short-text-from-Robert-Godes-regarding-the-test/ >> >> Harry >> >> >> >> >> >
