clearly the 6 proton have to be synchronous/intricated/coherent

if you succeed with a 3 body p-e-p (which need some be be coherent)
why not 6.

but you are right
 1D variant looks more acceptable
D->He4->li6

looks like Brillouin theory, but with Iwamura style (even hydrogen fusion).

my reason to challenge the 1D sequence of pure hydroton is that the
intermediate 4H disintegrate with gamma... but maybe simply is the electron
a witness.

there are many question, like the symmetry of electrons... it is more
symmetric with 3D 3p-3e-3p fusion.

I don't say I'm right (it is improbable ah ah ) , just that it is too early
to eliminate hypothesis.


Something coherent have to happen anyway.
multibody reaction are required by LENR, this is not an argument.

3 body reaction without reaction and nearly impossible... 2 body is not
observed.
3 or 6, are miracle, which mean there is a trick, an easy trick, easier
than hotfusion; if easy for 3 why not for 6 ?


2014-10-14 15:03 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene <[email protected]>:

>  *From:* Alain Sepeda
>
>  6p+3e->li6  (add the neutrino)
>
> it can be made zero momentum
>
>
>
> I take it from hydroton theory, with a possibility that it is not 1D, but
> 3D reaction
>
>
>
> Please clarify: six protons coming together at one time is a six-body
> reaction, no? How do all 6 get there at the same instant in any dimension?
>

Reply via email to