Maybe I misunderstood but when he said the march test, I thought he meant
the march test of 2013.

Harry

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:17 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Alumina is a top notch insulator and the coil is imbedded in it.  More
> heat must be leaving other routes. Where r the fins?  I have not studied
> the photos.
>
> On Monday, October 13, 2014, H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The banded regions should absorb heat and in the long run reach the same
>> temperature as their surroundings. The fact that they persist is a sign of
>> something significant...and I don't mean fraud or incompetence.
>>
>> Harry
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:54 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The coil stays cooler than the core when it is heating thru induction
>>> due to less resistance in the coil so that is why I think the coil is
>>> darker/cooler
>>>
>>> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_cooking
>>>
>>> In an induction cooker, a coil of copper wire is placed underneath the
>>> cooking pot . An alternating ..... In turn, most of the energy becomes heat
>>> in the high- resistance steel, while the driving coil stays cool.
>>>
>>> On Monday, October 13, 2014, H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Figure 6 : this is complicated by transmission, which may be happening
>>>>> in the visible range. (IF the helical shadows are indeed images or shadows
>>>>> of the coiuls. But I still think they represent different conduction zones
>>>>> of a ceramic holder, as in the March test). However, this has a broad peak
>>>>> near the center of the visible range, so the blue might be enhanced a
>>>>> little.
>>>>> ​
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I find it odd the dark bands (a.k.a the "shadows") persist.  I can
>>>> understand how differences in conduction​
>>>>
>>>> ​play a role when the reactor first starts but in the long run
>>>> shouldn't the dark bands disappear?
>>>>
>>>> Harry
>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to