We may eventually come to the conclusion that the nickel can produce power even in the molten form. That seems to be what is implied. Is there reason to assume that molten nickel can not work? A higher temperature might enhance the process that is not well understood at the moment. I have no opinion about this matter. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Oct 15, 2014 3:47 pm Subject: [Vo]:the true source of energy
If the nickel particles are the ultimate source of 3.5Xover-unity heat in the Rossi reactor, it is paradoxical and against commonsense that 900 constantly applied watts of heat energy is required to keep the nickel particlesactive. Furthermore, this COP value is far under what the Hot-catcan do. The real COP is somewhere north of 6. At an external temperature that is hovering at 1400C fordays, there is no room for differences in temperature within the guts of thereactor itself. The answer must be that the nickel particles are not themain source of the heat in the reactor. They need lots of heat stimulation tofunction and they are not getting that heat from over-unity heat production. The isotopic tests confirm that the nickel particles arepure nickel. These particles must melt at 1450C. The conclusion that logic forces us to arrive at must bethat there is another place where all that over unity heat is coming from. These particles cannot be producing (900watts) (3.5) = 3150 watts of output power.
