From: Randy Wuller
So for example, let’s say Rossi knew that by setting up the
constraints associated with testing the ash, (1% from stuff that fell out),
everyone would be misled as to what was actually happening. That’s more
appropriately described as protecting your IP. Randy - I never said anything about a crime. Why are you? None of the TV scams I mentioned were prosecuted as a crime, as far as I know. If dishonesty was a crime, we would have to lock up half of the politicians in DC. Make that: more than half. And also - aren’t you assuming that he is not misleading his funder, as well? Would your opinion change if you found out that his royalty agreement was a long-term deal structured around performance milestones? I have no idea what his deal consists of, but I doubt if he can walk away with a large sum without some kind of verification that the device actually works. It is normal business practice with many inventions that a large portion of the total royalty payment will in escrow pending milestones and/or will be delayed until cash-flow starts, meaning that a commercial product emerges. Jones
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
