Jones-please continue to speculate about new thoughts as that is our best method of getting to the truth. I get a bit concerned when I hear you speak of scams. You apparently have drawn that conclusion at this point due to the isotope measurements and that is certainly strange. But, have you considered that something unusual is happening to the fuel that perhaps enabled the enriched Ni62 to be expelled but trapped most of the other material?
Strange things happen in the universe, some of which defy explanation until the complete picture is obtained. You have a right to question occurrences that do not add up, but I hope that you will avoid using the 's' word until it has been proven. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Oct 16, 2014 1:27 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:temperature of the resistor wire. From:David Roberson Jones, what you write here is pure speculation. Dave - I made it clearthat this was my opinion. Can I not express my opinion? In order to fill in theblanks, to make a complete scenario – that does require speculation. But it is fact, ABSOLUTEFACT - that the odds of finding pure Ni62 in a sample are astronomical. Giventhat, a scam is the only probable scenario. From there on, follow the buck. I share some concerns about the temperature measurements and howthey might influence the output power, but there is certainly no seriousevidence that Rossi was able to impact the testing in a serious manner. Temperature is not myconcern. In fact, the temperature measurement could be correct or even on thelow side. The odds of finding pure Ni62 in a sample are astronomical. That ismy problem. Why do you continue to suggest a scam of some type? The odds of finding pureNi62 in a sample are astronomical. If anything happened in error I for one believe it was an honestmistake. The odds of finding pureNi62 in a sample are astronomical. There is no room for honest mistake giventhat the testing was done two different ways by two different people with thesame result. This isotope was saltedinto the sample. From there on, the details to make it fit together are speculation,but so is extending you paper model to an un-calibrated experiment which wasimproperly performed. Jones
