Or at the very least, he'd trust  / take a chance that the patent office
will give him a patent.

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> "I don't care who gets there first".   Not sure how you can possibly
> interpret that any other way.   Obviously he wants to be first otherwise
> he'd give away the IP.
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>>  *From:* Blaze Spinnaker
>>
>>
>> *http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/techflash/2014/10/raleigh-investor-darden-still-bullish-on.html?page=all*
>> <http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/techflash/2014/10/raleigh-investor-darden-still-bullish-on.html?page=all>
>>
>> Ø       I was re-reading this, and I strongly agree with one of the
>> comments…."“I don’t care who gets there first, how it happens,” he says.
>> “I just want to see it happen.”" …The statement is either a total
>> misquote or a complete lie, and therefore undermines the credibility of Tom
>> Darden in a huge way.
>>
>> No way ! You have this interpretation all wrong. This statement is fully
>> consistent with a commendable executive – one with both a high level of
>> social conscience  and at the same time, a strong belief that he can do
>> it better than the competition; so he welcomes them to join him to push
>> the field forward … but if he cannot do it better – he wants society to
>> benefit over investors.
>>
>> I find this admirable. After all, he must realize that Randell Mills has
>> a 20 year head start and is better funded, and is not burdened with a
>> nutty inventor.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to