Or at the very least, he'd trust / take a chance that the patent office will give him a patent.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: > "I don't care who gets there first". Not sure how you can possibly > interpret that any other way. Obviously he wants to be first otherwise > he'd give away the IP. > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> *From:* Blaze Spinnaker >> >> >> *http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/techflash/2014/10/raleigh-investor-darden-still-bullish-on.html?page=all* >> <http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/techflash/2014/10/raleigh-investor-darden-still-bullish-on.html?page=all> >> >> Ø I was re-reading this, and I strongly agree with one of the >> comments…."“I don’t care who gets there first, how it happens,” he says. >> “I just want to see it happen.”" …The statement is either a total >> misquote or a complete lie, and therefore undermines the credibility of Tom >> Darden in a huge way. >> >> No way ! You have this interpretation all wrong. This statement is fully >> consistent with a commendable executive – one with both a high level of >> social conscience and at the same time, a strong belief that he can do >> it better than the competition; so he welcomes them to join him to push >> the field forward … but if he cannot do it better – he wants society to >> benefit over investors. >> >> I find this admirable. After all, he must realize that Randell Mills has >> a 20 year head start and is better funded, and is not burdened with a >> nutty inventor. >> > >