I think the images from the report seen in Figures 12a, 12b, Image 12b is very 
underexposed , I adjusted the exposure levels on 12b and made a side by side 
image to compare, it seems that the color temperature might be quite a bit 
whiter, perhaps even "white hot." when seen as it would have looked if the 
levels were not so dark.
http://www.pixhost.org/show/1349/23608237_adjusted-side-by-side.png


Nixter


On Sunday, October 19, 2014 7:54 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:
 


I think the fact you can the see the possible outline of a coil and possibly 
fins shows a difference in visible//translucent light radiation in those areas.

I also find quite a bit of research on translucent sintered alumina and its 
ability to scatter light through rayleigh and mie scattering.  Sintered alumina 
can appear translucent yellow depending upon how it is sintered.


http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/175704/files/NanoporeCharacterizationAndOpticalModelingOfTransparentPolycrystallineAlumina.pdf

http://repository.tudelft.nl/assets/uuid:ad82e9ad-f44f-41d6-86eb-8e64d2e0086b/MS-21.908.pdf


Whether this has any bearing on visible color @ high temp in the photos I am 
not sure.  Somebody needs to heat some!

Stewart


On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>Consider the difference between the sun at noon and the sun at dawn/dusk. The 
>interior of the HotCat glows white but from the outside it glows red like a 
>sunrise because it is shinning through an atmosphere of alumina. 
>
>
>It does not work that way. If the outside surface temperature really is 1400 
>deg C, then the outside surface material should be incandescent white. It does 
>not matter what the inside temperature is. All materials glow with the same 
>incandescent color at a given temperature. That is what the textbooks claim.
>
>
>I doubt any light is shining through the alumina, but even if it is, the light 
>from incandescence of the outside alumina material itself should be white.
>
>
>- Jed
>
>

Reply via email to