In reply to  Robert Ellefson's message of Sat, 25 Oct 2014 17:53:02 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]

The reactions I already provided make a lot more sense than these, because they
are two particle reactions, where these are three particle reactions, which are
very rare. Furthermore these reactions require that two neutrons transfer
simultaneously, which is also highly unlikely. In the reactions I provided only
a single neutron need "hop".

>Oops, I see at least one significant typo in the reaction table.
>
>The first line should read:
>
>Li-7 + Ni-58 + Li-7 + stimulus -> 2Li-6 + Ni-60 + sr-gammas
>
>This is the first step of the enrichment cycle.
>
>-Bob
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert > Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 5:29 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: [Vo]:A new type of laser is born?
>> 
>> I believe that a continuous neutron-exchange reaction cycle is taking
>place
>> between lithium and nickel, which includes the following reactions:
>> 
>> Li-7 + Ni-58 + Li-7 + stimulus -> 2Li-6 + Ni-58 + sr-gammas
>> Li-7 + Ni-60 + Li-7 + stimulus -> 2Li-6 + Ni-62 + sr-gammas
>> Li-7 + Ni-61 + Li-6 + stimulus -> 2Li-6 + Ni-62 + sr-gammas
>> Li-7 + Ni-62 + Li-7 + stimulus -> 2Li-7 + Ni-62 + enhanced sr-gammas (no
>> neutrons exchanged)
>> Li-6 + Ni-62 + Li-6 + enhanced stimulus -> 2Li-7 + Ni-60 + sr-gammas
>> Li-6 + Ni-64 + Li-6 + stimulus -> 2Li-7 + Ni-62 + sr-gammas
>> Li-6 + Ni-60 + Li-6 + stimulus -> 2Li-7 + Ni-58 + sr-gammas
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to