Re: FQHE There is a connection between LENR and the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect. That connection is the production of quasi-stable particles from the vacuum as stimulated by the action of a magnetic field.
Under the influence of a electron, a impinging magnetic field produces two counter rotating vortexes of magnetic flux in the vacuum. This magnetic behavior relative to the electron produces what is called Composite fermions. this theory is a result of the repulsive interactions produced by these two vortexes (or, in general, an even number of vortices) are captured by each electron, forming integer-charged quasiparticles called composite fermions. The fractional states of the electrons are understood as the integer QHE of composite fermions. For example, this makes electrons at filling factors 1/3, 2/5, 3/7, etc. behave in the same way as at filling factor 1, 2, 3, etc. The vortexes steal charge from the electron as the Composite fermions attempt to minimize the enegy of that system. Composite fermions have been observed, and the theory has been partially verified by experiment and modeled by computer calculations. Composite fermions are valid even beyond the fractional quantum Hall effect in a degraded state; for example, the filling factor 1/2 corresponds to zero magnetic field for composite fermions, resulting in their Fermi sea. One possible explanation of Mills observation of fractional charge might be the FQHE. In LENR, magnetic fields produces subatomic particles from the vacuum in the presence of atomic nuclei. These mesons tend to destabilize the nuclei by disrupting the pion stabilizing intercommunication protocol between protons and neutrons. Further, as the mesons decay into pions and then muons, muon catalyzed fusion occurs. As in the FQHE, the field strength of the magnetic field results in a wide variation of disruptive nuclear effects involving many atoms which might even include the production in its most powerful manifestation, a quark gluon plasma from with multi-nuclei cluster fusion results. On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Over the years here on vortex, we have considered the mass-equivalence of > charge as being intrinsic to understanding thermal anomalies under the > broad category of LENR (despite the fact that there is nothing nuclear > going on). > > > > This would be an important parameter if it was discovered that FQHE plays > a role in LENR, or possibly we can go so far as to say *FQHE is LENR* in > some experiments, where no high energy radiation is seen. Which is to say, > can confined electrons, either free or in hydrogen orbitals, be forced to > give up fractional charge in 2-D space which is converted to mass in 3-D > space, and which is later regauged by zero point? > > > > Here is a provocative paper for the open-minded - which considers charge > as a photon > > > > http://milesmathis.com/photon3.pdf > > > > “By energy, this makes the charge photon infrared. By wavelength, it makes > the charge photon ultraviolet. But since I [Mathis] have thrown out the > current wavelengths as inapplicable to the photon itself, we should look at > energy. The charge photon is still infrared.” > > > > IR and UV radiation, in general - both turn up in LENR more often than > visible light, or RF, or x-rays, or gamma. This cross-identity of a > “photon-like” carrier particle for LERN could be the crux of what has > confused many theorists all along – including Randell Mills, “America’s > Newton” … <g> > > > > Jones > > >
