Axil, great observation and I agree totally, I have stated previously that this may be observable when LENR reactors become available by placing a battery operated reactor on one side of a beam balance scale and intentionally unbalancing the counterweights, first with the unit off to establish a baseline and then a second time with the unit on. I posit that this would side step the likely cancellation of much of the reactionless bias for any spatial vector and instead demonstrate a much more marked change in inertia where changes in counter weight values react very slowly due to this increased linkage to the virtual dimension. I do think it will eventually lead to reactionless drive but Difiore et all had difficulty with stacking cavities to any effect and almost negligible dilation factors for laser beams measured through a Casimir cavity makes me suspect there is an issue with addressing the “aperature” into this dimension in a spatially biased manner… which is why I think inertia effects might be the easier goal to prove the effect at a more measurable level.
Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:24 PM To: vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:Biefeld–Brown effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biefeld%E2%80%93Brown_effect Biefeld–Brown effect <snip> There has been follow-ups on the claims that this propulsive force can be produced in a full vacuum, meaning it is an unknown anti-gravity force, and not just the more well known <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_wind> ion wind, with several researchers (R. L. Talley in a 1990 US Air Force study, NASA scientist Jonathan Campbell in a 2003 experiment, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biefeld–Brown_effect#cite_note-6> [6] and <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Tajmar> Martin Tajmar in a 2004 paper <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biefeld–Brown_effect#cite_note-7> [7]) finding that no thrust could be observed in a vacuum, consistent with the phenomenon of ion wind. Campbell pointed out to a <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wired_(magazine)> Wired magazine reporter that creating a true vacuum similar to space for the test requires tens of thousands of dollars in equipment. <EndSnip> There is a striking parallel between LENR and reactionless propulsion. On the most basic level, LENR is a result of the production of charged subatomic particles out of the vacuum through the action of focused EMF. These bosons are mesons produced by a highly focused beam of EMF. Reactionless propulsion could be the result of the same mechanism where huge EMF is pointed in a focused direction that could produce subatomic particles out of the vacuum and push against those particles giving them momentum in that direction to exert a propulsive force in the opposite direction. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive The EmDrive If the EmDrive and LENR spring from basically the same source, would it not be reasonable to expect a connection be drawn between LENR and reactionless propulsion. Might not LENR produce Em-Propulsion and the EmDrive mechanism produce LENR. This common mechanism involves the momentary realization of subatomic particles out of the vacuum. Another connect might be drawn in. Antigravity seems to be produced by electron vortexes that exist on the surface of superconductors. We would expect that these vortexes produced a focused EMF beam perpendicular to the plain of vortex rotation. Could Anti-gravity be a manifestation of the EmDrive and LENR? Could there be a connection?
