I am decreasign my ASSessment of an ASSurance that Blaze will pull his head out of his ASinine "hind quarters" from 6.59% down to 6.4%. SSDD from Blaze.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > Probability now at 35% based on allegations of what I consider to be fraud > from a partner. > > > http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/11/24/probability-now-35-based-on-allegations-of-fraud/ > > > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Blaze exhibits his wishy-washiness yet again. He also doesn't follow his >> own posted "criteria", which was that if the report came out after >> September he would lower the probability to 25%, which he never did. He >> went straight to 20% yesterday and today he's at 45%. Because of ONE >> reaction to the report. One might as well use a windvane, it would give >> at least traceable information. >> >> Oh well, at least he's posting on his own thread. >> >> So I'm constrained, again, to decrease my ASSessment of an ASSurance >> that Blaze will pull his head out of his ASinine "hind quarters" from 7.09% >> down to 6.59%. Blaze might as well start building a shelter, because his >> head will be staying there for a long time. >> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/09/probability-is-now-45/ >>> >>> Based on http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece >>> >>> Exciting times! >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/probability-now-20/ >>>> >>>> Disappointed to see the same names at the top of the paper. Shocked >>>> to see not even Arxiv will accept it. I will increase the probability if >>>> does make it onto Arxiv or if we see IH and Cherokee step up. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/29/probability-is-now-27/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/probability-rossi-is-real-is-now-28/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, John Berry <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Well I worded that strongly to drive home a point, we often hide our >>>>>>> ignorance in the talk of probability. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are 4 domains in which we apply probability. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1: Things which are set and we are ignorant of, no actual element of >>>>>>> chance exist, such as with Rossi. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2: Macro chance, things that we fail to predict but maybe could if >>>>>>> we did sufficiently in-depth analysis, this could be likened to the >>>>>>> spinning of a wheel of wheel of fortune >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3: While a machine could be used to spin a wheel and get the desired >>>>>>> selection to come up on a wheel, some things seem beyond our ability to >>>>>>> predict. The experiment with falling BB's hitting pegs and being >>>>>>> seemingly >>>>>>> effected by the intent of the observer in university studies backs up >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> this is maybe beyond modeling within known physics/ Rolling a dice is >>>>>>> similar, but we do know dice can be loaded showing that even on this >>>>>>> level >>>>>>> small physical changes can reduce the randomness. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 4: Quantum physics where it is believed God does actually pay dice. >>>>>>> But this is in ignorance of the state of the aether behind such >>>>>>> interactions. >>>>>>> It could be that these things are not random at all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But even IF you believe that probability really exist, that does not >>>>>>> apply to Rossi. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And if you were to hide ignorance in the language of probability >>>>>>> despite the obvious lack of 'chance', there is the fact that if you >>>>>>> were at >>>>>>> 1% confidence and then saw one tiny single sign, you could have to go to >>>>>>> 100%. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Such as an event that can only be explained by Rossi being genuine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Granted this is difficult with magicians (illusionists) and con men, >>>>>>> but there has very likely been such a sign that either moves him to >>>>>>> 100% or >>>>>>> damn near 0%. >>>>>>> Not that there is anything that could prove him false so easily >>>>>>> including proof he faked a test as there might be genuine motives to >>>>>>> fake a >>>>>>> test despite being genuinely in possession of the real thing, it really >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> harder/impossible to prove a negative. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen >>>>>>>> or they don't. Rossi either IS real, or he is NOT real.. >>>>>>>> There is no such thing as probability in reality." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I see.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:12 PM, John Berry <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Blaze's ego is astounding, thinking that he has things so well >>>>>>>>> worked out that his ramblings about probability have meaning. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Even if he were that good at working out probability, a few facts >>>>>>>>> remain that make it worthless. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen or >>>>>>>>> they don't. Rossi either IS real, or he is NOT real.. >>>>>>>>> There is no such thing as probability in reality. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2: What is the difference between a 30% chance and a 70% chance? >>>>>>>>> Answer 1: 40% >>>>>>>>> Answer 2: Nothing much, both means that there is a very real >>>>>>>>> possibility of it going either way. >>>>>>>>> If you were invested in oil, it would mean that there is a very >>>>>>>>> real risk that you must take seriously. >>>>>>>>> If you are on the side of good, you know that there is an >>>>>>>>> extraordinary possibility that might be worthy of attention, but >>>>>>>>> might not >>>>>>>>> pan out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But the difference between 0.1% chance and a 0.0000001% chance is >>>>>>>>> huge! >>>>>>>>> With the 0.1% there is a long shot, but one that could still very >>>>>>>>> well pan out. Just 1 in 1,000 is not too distant odds to let one >>>>>>>>> ignore >>>>>>>>> something potentially significant good or bad. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But 0.0000001 is 1 in ten million, an almost impossible long shot >>>>>>>>> worthy of no attention/investment unless there are enough of these low >>>>>>>>> level 'promises/threats' to bring it up to a level of relevance. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> John >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Kevin O'Malley < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm constrained to decrease my ASSessment of an ASSurance >>>>>>>>>> that Blaze will pull his head out of his ASinine "hind quarters" >>>>>>>>>> down to >>>>>>>>>> 7.51%, taking into account the direction of the wind and the stock >>>>>>>>>> price for CYPW Cyclone Power. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> At least this time Blaze increased the chances of Rossi being real >>>>>>>>>> on the basis of stuff that had SOMEthing to do with Rossi. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, he thinks the In Mercato Veritas is a sign of unrealness rather >>>>>>>>>> than the OBVIOUS thing it is: >>>>>>>>>> an old fashioned Rossism expression of confidence. This was >>>>>>>>>> exactly the way Rossi used to post >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> before his friend Focardi got cancer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When Blaze talks about the lack of news leaks, he doesn't seem to >>>>>>>>>> realize he's engaging in a classic >>>>>>>>>> fallacy of arguing from silence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Going to start publishing updates on this blog >>>>>>>>>>> http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/ rather than this mailing list. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rossi is now at 30% >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Kevin O'Malley < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If it's interesting enough to generate a patent then it is >>>>>>>>>>>> worthwhile. The world would sit up and take notice simply because >>>>>>>>>>>> Rossi >>>>>>>>>>>> ain't a fraud, as the common notion suggests. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Another possibility is IH may have decided they don't want the >>>>>>>>>>>>> world competing with them, so they gave the researchers an eCat >>>>>>>>>>>>> which is >>>>>>>>>>>>> just enough interesting to generate a patent but not so >>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting it >>>>>>>>>>>>> causes the world to sit up and take notice. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> More and more I'm beginning to wonder if we're going to get a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TIP report that shows something interesting, but nowhere >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guaranteeing the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> power densities shown in the first report. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While I believe that Rossi believes he has something and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IH believes they have something and that there is no fraudulent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> behavior >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on here, I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the middle is, yes energy, just not very exciting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy. And possibly, after some analysis, it could be just an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> impressive >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new source of chemical energy that's competitive perhaps with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocket Fuel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the best case scenario, but in reality it's just competitive >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimal Geothermal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this scenario, I consider the eCat not to have lived up to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> its promises which is why my estimate is around 35%. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Decreasing the probability to 31% based on smelly stock >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> offering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://freeenergyscams.com/andrea-rossi-e-cat-hydro-fusion-cashing-in-before-the-collapse/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HydroFusion is ran by Dr. Magnus Holm. Seems credible - but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why didn't he wait until after the report to ask for more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money? Why is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rossi doing shout outs about Dr Holm? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea Rossi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> May 18th, 2014 at 11:20 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848&cpage=1#comment-957368> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Orsobubu: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your comment, that indroduces us to the paper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published today on the Journal of Nuclear Physics: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GEOMETRY OF STRING THEORY SOLITONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Dr Magnus Holm . It is an important work of this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientist made in 1999, but I find his work dense of important >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not an easy reading, the work is rigorous, but this is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Journal of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nuclear Physics, and the paper is perfectly in line with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of our Journal. Dr Magnus Holm is presently working >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me for the E-Cat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About the comment of our friend Orsobubu: I do not share his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certainties regarding the so called “social sciences”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warm Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.R. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This could be just really inane business strategy or perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Magnus just doesn't have a good contract with Rossi/IH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who really believe in Rossi, my suggestion would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be to contact Hydro fusion and buy up as many shares as you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly can. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think everything comes down to this report that should be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming over the next month. We could see a rise over over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20-30% on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basis of this report. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another possibility is that the report may reveal a low COP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is competitive only with geothermal and could be the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> result of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uninteresting fuel sources. (which means a drop in probability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of 10% or so) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another (unlikely in my mind) possibility is that the report >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will reveal that it doesn't do anything useful, which will be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop in 25%. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Decreasing the probability to 35% based on shattering news >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Defkalion demo being completely worthless. I hesitate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to say it, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but It almost sounds like fraud is being implied. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://animpossibleinvention.com/2014/05/12/defkalion-demo-proven-not-to-be-reliable/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Decreasing probability to 46% based on lack of news from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nanor but up to 47% based on recent news from Darden in China: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.icebank.cn/news/detail_2.php?id=118 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hat tip: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/05/09/tom-darden-involved-in-opening-of-nickel-hydrogen-energy-research-center-in-tianjin-china/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: I suspect there will be an up to (-30%, +15%) swing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in probability when the june report comes out. Big news >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MIT videos. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Put that back to 43%: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Darden earned an MRP in environmental planning from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,* a JD >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from Yale Law School* and a BA from the University of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he was a Morehead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scholar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correction, make that 41%. It's not Cherokee but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather Tom Darden (investor, co founder of Cherokee) and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Vaughn >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (senior analyst at Cherokee, BA Economics) who are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> players here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It'd be good to find out who those other investors are. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Increasing the probability to 44% on the basis of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cherokee PR release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Big big BIG news. Now this is no longer about Rossi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but about Cherokee. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know you guys think I'm a git for my doubt, but hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my model is waaaay ahead of the curve than the vast >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> majority of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investing universe. XOM is still trading near >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical highs, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latest news coming out of BLP and McKubre. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon. The next indie report on the ecat should be an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inflection report. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fulvio , the tech Director & R.D. at Leonardo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corporation MIAMI - FL - USA previous job was: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> " Frelance Consultant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&title=Frelance+Consultant&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true¤tTitle=CP&trk=prof-exp-title> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> European >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gaming and Gambling Tech Market >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&company=European+Gaming+and+Gambling+Tech+Market&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true&trk=prof-exp-company-name> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -4% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now back to 31%. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is based on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Rossi stating third party reports in March >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (increased 2%) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. Could be updating this probability more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frequently. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
