On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:02:00AM -0400, Peter Amstutz wrote: > As I said, it's not ideal, but the advantages in potential > compatability/familiarity outweigh stylistic issues.
Perhaps. I think it might be possible to come up with less-verbose, less-vos-idiomatic, more-obvious-to-casual-users XML with a little care. > Oh? What does this format look like? And what kind of problems with SWIG > are you having? What is the status of the Python bindings, anyway? It takes any XML and makes hypervos objects out of it. The error is that when I add the %template directive for the password authentication object and %include it, swig crashes. > >... > >What the hell does "href" mean? ;) > > You know, like <a href="..."> > > But I might change it. Yeah I was kidding--- it seems familiar from HTML but it means nothing here and will end up being more confusing unless it's actually used in e xactly the same way as html... reed _______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d