Thanks Sasha for explanation.

@Victor :- Now I have removed old versions of Gromacs and tried the same
thing, i.e. concat the trajectories for fmatch. Surprisingly I dont get any
segmentation fault error now. I will send you the gdb output if it happens
again.


Is there any limit on number of frames per block? Does increasing
frames/block improves the accuracy?
What is the suggested value of error in .force file for convergence
criteria?  Also, what is this error exactly? I mean, how is it computed?

thanks
sikandar

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Victor Ruehle <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> I tried to reproduce the error but didn't occur for me. Also using a
> different gromacs version for simulation for catting/simulation should
> not be a problem for the trajectories. The only thing you should make
> sure is that you sourced an "interface compatible" (or better the
> same) gromacs version you compiled votca with when running csg_fmatch.
>
> If that doesn't help, could you please send the output of gdb (gdb
> csg_fmatch, then type run <all-args-fmtach-needs>, after the segfault
> type bt).
>
> Cheers,
> Victor
>
> 2010/10/28 Alexander Lukyanov <[email protected]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is just a dirty debug-message.
> >
> > If your interpolation grid is too small, and some of the bins are
> > completely unsampled during MD simulations, than instead of the number
> > you will get a NaN (not-a-number) there.
> > So that you immediately can kill the program and restart it with more
> > reasonable parameters, without
> > waiting until it finishes and produces NaNs in the output file.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Sasha
> >
> >> Also, csg_fmatch prints messages like  "This should be a number:
> >> 3.0561" , after each block step. What does it mean? I dont find any
> >> description about this in the manual.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <votca%[email protected]>.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
> >
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <votca%[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.

Reply via email to