Hi
Marc-André

One way to determine LJ potential energy terms is to first obtain CG
potential using IBI or IMC method and then fit 12-6 LJ functional form to
it. Of course, the quality of fit would depend upon whether the CG potential
has the LJ type shape or not.

--
sikandar

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Marc-André Dubois
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi guys,
>               Is there a way to obtain The Lennard-Jones potential energy
> terms for the interaction between 2 CG beads from the radial distribution
> function? Thank you,
>
> Marc-André
>
> Le 2011-09-01 à 12:21, Marc-André Dubois a écrit :
>
> > Victor,
> >           I appreciate your answer. Basically, one goal of this
> investigation is to reproduce some of the amphiphilic behavior of a molecule
> that we have synthesize here in the lab. We would like to simulate the
> transition from a aqueous environment to an apolar one and the conformation
> change of our molecule to better understand the mechanism of these types of
> molecules. The first idea was to use MARTINI to do this, so we tried using
> this tool, and we get some results but we would like to construct a more
> accurate coarse grained representation of the studied molecule.
> >
> > I will se the literature that you have propose. Thanks for your help,
> >
> > Marc-André
> >
> >
> > Le 2011-09-01 à 12:02, Victor Ruehle a écrit :
> >
> >> Dear Marcc-André,
> >>
> >> are you now just asking about the technical aspect, or about the
> >> method itself? If the latter, there is no clear answer to your
> >> problem. There are various methods available. The first question you
> >> should ask yourself is what kind of properties you want to reproduce
> >> in with your coarse-grained model.
> >>
> >> Most methods implemented in VOTCA are structure based approaches (or
> >> closely related to it) and therefore will most probably do wrong on
> >> thermodynamics. You can e.g. check the VOTCA references
> >> (http://www.votca.org/citations), there are also lot's of references
> >> given in the papers for more details on the method or links to other
> >> methods. That's still an incomplete list, but might be a good point to
> >> start with.
> >>
> >> If you want to act on the rdfs, I would start with IBI (see section in
> >> the manual). Otherwise, also force-matching or a hybrid approach might
> >> be worth a try. It's not yet officially supported in VOTCA, but
> >> depending on your system, it might be worth to have a look at what the
> >> MARTINI force field people did.
> >>
> >> Don't hesitate to ask any further questions, but providing some more
> >> details might help...
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Victor
> >>
> >> 2011/9/1 Marc-André Dubois <[email protected]>:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>          I tried to follow the tutorials that you provide on your
> website. Coarse-grained models are not actually the biggest concern of my
> group, so I have to start from the basis. As I actually understand the
> thing, I have to:
> >>>
> >>> 1. constructs an atomistic representation of the system, which will
> give to you data to construct the coarse grained representation.
> >>> 2. runs a molecular dynamic at the atomistic scale
> >>> 3. obtains the radial distribution function for each of your CG beads
> >>>
> >>> From step 1 to step 3, I think that everything works fine. From these
> steps, how it is possible to find the actual interaction potentials of the
> CG beads to constructs a forcefield that GROMACS will understand? I am sorry
> that this question would seems trivial, but as I previously said, I am not
> familiar with these kind of experiments. Thank you,
> >>>
> >>> Marc-André Dubois
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "votca" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "votca" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.

Reply via email to