On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Alexander Alexander
<alexanderwie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Christoph.
>
> I know they are zero, and
>
>> <alexand...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > The potential_shift.pl crashes in IBI for some of the bond and angles in
>> > step 5, I have already seen a suggestion in mailing list such that "one
>> > should pick the minimum of the interaction (min property) bigger than 0,
>> > so
>> > that the target rdf is bigger than 0 as well" (although the crash for
>> > this
>> > old discussion happened in the step_001). If with minimum of the
>> > interaction
>> > you mean is the <min>XXXX</min> in the settings.xml file, then it is
>> > already
>> > more that 0 in may case (<min>2.713</min>). Also in general I did not
>> > understand the solutions proposed over there. So, I have attached here
>> > some
>> > steps of evolution of the problematic angel during IBI, and I would be
>> > so
>> > appreciated if one could help overcome the problem.
>> Looking at your inverse.log: above the error banner "No valid value
>> found in angle-H-L-RG.dpot.pure_ibi"
>> Looking at angle-H-L-RG.dpot.pure_ibi, all values are marked "o".
>> angle-H-L-RG.dist.tgt looks ok, but step_005/angle-H-L-RG.dist.new is all
>> zeros.
>> So why that is I don't know, but you might want to run csg_stat by hand:
>
> Yes, they are all zero.
>
>>
>> csg_stat --nt 32 --options
>> /home/alex/test/CG/dw/jeffamine-n2/ATB/ibi1/settings.xml --top
>> topol.tpr --trj tra
>> j.xtc --begin 50 --first-frame 0 --cg
>> /home/alex/test/CG/dw/jeffamine-n2/ATB/ibi1/jeffamine2-cg.xml
>
> Invoking this show nothing again all zero, while invoking this in step_004
> results to a nonzero output. From step 004 to 005 the only thing which
> change is the traj.xtc, so it might be something with the mdrun over the
> system.
My guess is that your system is slowly exploding in step 5 and hence
there are no value for the angle in range you specified in the xml
file.

Christoph
>
>>
>> (from inverse.log)
>> my guess is that something in wrong in jeffamine2-cg.xml, which should
>> be a 1:1 mapping on the cg level.
>
> If that is the case why this does not happen in the steps before? As they
> are using the same jeffamine2-cg.xml.
> Anyway, I have attached both jeffamine2-cg.xml jeffamine2-aa.xml.
>
> Best regards,
> Alex
>>
>> Christoph
>> > Thank you.
>> > Regards,
>> > Alex
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "votca" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to votca+un...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To post to this group, send email to vo...@googlegroups.com.
>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to votca+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to votca@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to votca+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to votca@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to