On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:00 PM Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>       OK, thanks! I have increased the bin size and the distribution seems to 
> be smoothed.
>       In some paper, the IBI process is started from bond and then angle, the 
> nonbonded potential is finished at last. When doing ibi for bond and angle, 
> the pair interaction is turned off. The chains are pushed apart to remove 
> close contacts by slowly turning on a soft, purely repulsive potential as you 
> said before. But I couldn't find the command in lammps.
That might be a question for the lammps mailing list!

>       Another question, how could I output the value of convergence for every 
> iterative step?
The convergence numbers are stores in a files for each interaction
called <NAME>.conv and the sum is printed in the log files, so you can
do:
$ grep "Convergence sum" inverse.log

This of course assumes you enabled the convergence check feature (with
setting cg.inverse.convergence_check.type to "default")

Christoph
>
> 在 2018年11月30日星期五 UTC+8下午11:24:33,Christoph Junghans写道:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:05 Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> In votca, the smoothing process works for potential. Is there any smoothing 
>>> process for new distribution? And what's the command?
>>
>> No, but it would be hard to add!
>>
>> Also increasing the bin size naturally does smoothing!
>>
>> Christoph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 2018年11月21日星期三 UTC+8下午9:03:19,Christoph Junghans写道:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:44 PM Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > The expression of boltzmann inversion is V=-kBTln(P). And the 
>>>> > distribution P is related to the scale of the x-coordinate. The plot of 
>>>> > bond distribution with different units are attached. In votca, all the 
>>>> > processes including calculating distributions and boltzmann inversion 
>>>> > are finished with units nm. So can I say that the obtained potential 
>>>> > table used in lammps is converted by V=-kBTln(P) with the length units 
>>>> > nm? So in lammps, the dynamic simulation is finished with length units 
>>>> > angstroms but with the potential corresponding to units nm.
>>>>
>>>> Well, V(x)= -kBTln(P(x)) and x can be a distance or an angle etc. V
>>>> and P are always parameterized by the same variable in its units. Also
>>>> P(x) is a distribution and hence is unit-less, plus the normalization
>>>> of the distribution doesn't matter much as ln(a*P)=ln a + ln P and
>>>> hence only leads to an irrelevant offset in the potential and doesn't
>>>> matter to the forces.
>>>>
>>>> Christoph
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > 在 2018年11月20日星期二 UTC+8下午11:43:59,Christoph Junghans写道:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 2:04 AM Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >     I have another question. If my units command is real in lammps 
>>>> >> > which the units of distance and energy are angstroms and Kcal/mole 
>>>> >> > respectively, what shoud I change in the setting file in order to get 
>>>> >> > the potential table with right units? Now, the bond and angle 
>>>> >> > potential of the CG system are much lower than the corresponding 
>>>> >> > atomic system.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Usually VOTCA calculated things in Gromacs units (so nm, kJ/mol etc.),
>>>> >> but if you only calculate RDFs you don't need to change anything as
>>>> >> input and output are both in nm and hence there is no scaling
>>>> >> involved. So this will work for angstroms as well. Additionally, you
>>>> >> need to make sure that kBT is in the right unit in the settings file.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Christoph
>>>> >> >     Thanks a lot.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > 在 2018年11月20日星期二 UTC+8上午5:52:29,Christoph Junghans写道:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:51 AM Christoph Junghans 
>>>> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 8:31 PM Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >> >> > >
>>>> >> >> > > For the dynamic simulations finished with lammps, should I set 
>>>> >> >> > > the exclusions? If excluding non-bonded interactions between 
>>>> >> >> > > atoms that are no further than 3 bonds away, does it need to 
>>>> >> >> > > excluding these atoms when statistical target rdf distributon?
>>>> >> >> > >
>>>> >> >> > Yes, for LAMMPS you will most likely need to create rdf exclusion 
>>>> >> >> > manually.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > You can check, what exclusion VOTCA see by running:
>>>> >> >> > $ csg_dump --top <your_topology_file> --excl
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > For advanced topology handling see, section 3.3 of the manual,
>>>> >> >> > http://doc.votca.org/manual.pdf
>>>> >> >> Also Joshua might be able to say something about the new LAMMPS
>>>> >> >> topology reader in csg and how exclusions are incorporated there.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Christoph
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Christoph
>>>> >> >> > > --
>>>> >> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>> >> >> > > Google Groups "votca" group.
>>>> >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>> >> >> > > it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>> >> >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> >> >> > > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>>>> >> >> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > --
>>>> >> >> > Christoph Junghans
>>>> >> >> > Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> --
>>>> >> >> Christoph Junghans
>>>> >> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> >> > Groups "votca" group.
>>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>> >> > send an email to [email protected].
>>>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>>>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Christoph Junghans
>>>> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> > Groups "votca" group.
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> > an email to [email protected].
>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christoph Junghans
>>>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "votca" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to