On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 22:55 Kankana Bhattacharjee <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sir, now angle_a1.xvg worked for gmx mdrun option.
>
What did you change?

I would like to know, if I run vacuum, single atomistic propane and single
> CG propane, all atom propane in vacuum then should I have to use "sd"
> integrator in all cases ?
>
You need some simulation that produces NVT ensemble, so the "sd" integrator
is one opinion or you could use "md" and an thermostat.

Christoph

>
>
>
> [image: Mailtrack]
> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>  Sender
> notified by
> Mailtrack
> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>  06/15/23,
> 10:21:58 AM
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 4:32 AM Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 00:17 Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Sir,
>>>
>>> All the table.xvg files (table_b1.xvg, table_b2.xvg, table_a1.xvg) are
>>> prepared using csg_call command. Now, I am trying to perform Gromacs CG-MD
>>> simulation of single CG propane using GROMACS and executed the
>>> command line:
>>>
>>>    1.
>>>
>>>    gmx_mpi mdrun -v -deffnm cg -tableb table_b1.xvg table_b2.xvg
>>>    table_a1.xvg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Now, error is coming like this: *In table file 'table_a1.xvg' the x
>>> values are not equally spaced: 0.000000
>>>
>>> 0.229153 0.343730
>>>
>>> How can I fix this issue i.e, equally spacing x values ?
>>>
>> I am not a 100 percent sure, what is going on!
>> Can you post the input files (pot and xvg) for the angle interaction?
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>  Sender
>>> notified by
>>> Mailtrack
>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>  06/14/23,
>>> 11:46:13 AM
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 5:55 PM Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 03:37 Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And, sir while using the csg_call command for single propane, then
>>>>> what settings.xml file has to be used to convert into table.xvg format ?
>>>>> Because for single propane folder, there is no settings.xml file.
>>>>>
>>>> The settings file is just a simple file that contains some more
>>>> information about the interaction, this file should work:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/votca/votca/blob/master/csg-tutorials/propane/ibi/settings.xml
>>>>
>>>> When you run csg_call it will tell you which items are read.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>  Sender
>>>>> notified by
>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>  06/12/23,
>>>>> 03:03:46 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 3:00 PM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok. Thanks a lot sir. But, what would be the maximum value for
>>>>>> specifying grid in case of bonds ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>  06/12/23,
>>>>>> 02:59:32 PM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:09 AM Christoph Junghans <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 5:29 AM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sir, I am not understanding the Resampling and extrapolation steps
>>>>>>>> for getting bonded.xvg files. For resampling options, in the command 
>>>>>>>> line:
>>>>>>>>   csg_resample --in table.pot --out table_resample.pot \ --grid
>>>>>>>> min:step:max
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How to choose min, step and max values here ? Kindly help me with
>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are some conditions that gromacs wants:
>>>>>>> - bonds type need to start at 0 to max (in nm)
>>>>>>> - angle type need to from 0 to 180 degrees
>>>>>>> - dihedrals type need to go from -18o t0 180 degrees
>>>>>>> (VOTCA internally uses radians, so you will need to convert that)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Most of that is implemented in:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/votca/votca/blob/master/csg/share/scripts/inverse/potential_to_gromacs.sh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can actually try to use that with:
>>>>>>> $ csg_call --ia-type bond --ia-name bond1 --settings.xml table.xml
>>>>>>> convert_potential gromacs table.pot table.xvg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also see:
>>>>>>> https://www.votca.org/csg/preparing.html#exporting-the-table
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>  06/09/23,
>>>>>>>> 04:58:12 PM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 4:05 PM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When converting the Boltzmann inverted potential (angle.pot.ib)
>>>>>>>>> into table.xvg using the command line : *csg_call --ia-type angle
>>>>>>>>> --ia-name angle1 --options table_a1.xml \ convert_potential gromacs
>>>>>>>>> angle_rad.pot.ib table_a1.xvg*
>>>>>>>>> then, getting the error like this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *table_linearop.pl <http://table_linearop.pl>: angle_rad.pot.ib to
>>>>>>>>> angle_rad.pot.scale.3tqbn with x' = 57.2957795*x + 0readin_table: Not
>>>>>>>>> enought columns in line 1 in file angle_rad.pot.ib, if you don't have 
>>>>>>>>> flags
>>>>>>>>> in your table add --sloppy-tables option to
>>>>>>>>> csg_callCallstack:/usr/bin/csg_call - linenumber 199    do_external -
>>>>>>>>> linenumber 176 in /usr/share/votca/scripts/inverse/functions_common.sh
>>>>>>>>>   /usr/share/votca/scripts/inverse/potential_to_gromacs.sh - 
>>>>>>>>> linenumber
>>>>>>>>> 124            do_external - linenumber 22 (see 'csg_call --cat 
>>>>>>>>> function
>>>>>>>>> do_external')                die - linenumber 2 (see 'csg_call --cat
>>>>>>>>> function
>>>>>>>>> die')######################################################################################################################
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                       ## ERROR:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    ## do_external: subscript
>>>>>>>>>                                              ##
>>>>>>>>> /usr/share/votca/scripts/inverse/table_linearop.pl
>>>>>>>>> <http://table_linearop.pl> --on-x angle_rad.pot.ib
>>>>>>>>> angle_rad.pot.scale.3tqbn 57.2957795 0 ## (from tags table linearop) 
>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     ## Details can be found above
>>>>>>>>>                                              ##
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ######################################################################################################################Terminated*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But, for bonded distributions table.xvg files generated. For angle
>>>>>>>>> potential, not getting the table and not able to figure out the error.
>>>>>>>>> Kindly help me with this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>>> Kankana Bhattacharjee
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>  06/09/23,
>>>>>>>>> 04:02:39 PM
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 3:10 PM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For bonded distribution, if I want to convert the table into xvg
>>>>>>>>>> format, then for the "Resampling step" the command line is, I want 
>>>>>>>>>> to know
>>>>>>>>>> what would be the "min:step:max" options for bonded distributions ? 
>>>>>>>>>> I am
>>>>>>>>>> not understanding this part.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> csg_resample --in table.pot --out table_resample.pot \             
>>>>>>>>>> --grid min:step:max
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I want to know what would be the *"min:step:max"* options for bonded 
>>>>>>>>>> distributions ? I am not understanding this part.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kankana Bhattacharjee
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>  06/09/23,
>>>>>>>>>> 03:08:17 PM
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 1:19 PM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sir, for getting the xvg table, at first I directly created
>>>>>>>>>>> table.xml file for bond length distribution and then used csg_call 
>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>> to convert the table into xvg format. But, I excluded the 
>>>>>>>>>>> "Resampling" and
>>>>>>>>>>> "Extrapolation" options. Is it the correct path ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>  06/09/23,
>>>>>>>>>>> 01:14:13 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 11:07 PM Christoph Junghans <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 07:54 Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir, to convert the bonded potentials into xvg format, at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first I have made table_b1.xml for bond1 type and then, used the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>> line:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  csg_call --ia-type bond --ia-name bond1 --options
>>>>>>>>>>>>> table_b1.xml \ convert_potential gromacs angle.pot.ib 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> table_b1.xvg. But,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the output file: table_b1.xvg looks somewhat different from the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> file given
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the ibi folder. Kindly provide some suggestions. Sir, my 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> table_b1.xvg is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking somewhat different from that of table_b1.xvg provided in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ibi
>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder. For converting into table.xvg, should "Resampling", and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Extrapolation" options also have to be followed in case of bonded
>>>>>>>>>>>>> distributions ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It depends on the system, but usually yes!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 6:02 PM Christoph Junghans <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, 06:29 Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry sir, bonded section is also there. To obtain a bond
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> table, the used command line is:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> csg_call --ia-type bond --ia-name XXX --options table.xml \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convert_potential gromacs table_extrapolate.pot table.xvg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to know, in --ia-name flag, what I should I put
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there, would it foolow the name which is mentioned in the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propane.xml file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in bonded section (bond1, bond2) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it is just the same names you defined in table.xml.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  06/08/23,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 03:57:07 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 3:46 PM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But, sir for this process, a table.xml file is given for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-bonded intercations. But, how to do the same job for bonded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distributions ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  06/08/23,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 03:44:48 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 3:42 PM Christoph Junghans <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, 06:01 Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. Thank you sir. I understood that, table number
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concept i.e, table_a1.xvg, table_b1.xvg. But, how can one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generate those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files to supply in bonded.itp file ? I can see those table 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (bond1,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> angle1).xvg files in the ibi directory. But, how those files 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.votca.org/csg/preparing.html#exporting-the-table
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 3:27 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [votca] Regarding-Getting-itp-files:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, 01:43 Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to know, how in the case of CG propane.itp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file, I have found that, "func type 8" is used which is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tabulated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functional form. And, in the case of "func type 8", there 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters "table number" and "spring constant" values. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And, how two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters (table number, spring constant) are obtained 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (which is equal to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 in topol.top file) ? Like, as I am doing it manually, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bonded values
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obtained from BI method, then how can I mention spring 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constant, and table
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number values in bonded.itp file ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The spring constant is yet another number the table gets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multipled with, but for BI you don't need another factor 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that hence we set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to 1.0!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The table number is arbitrary, but needs to consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the files name, table_b<#>.xvg and table_a<#>.xvg. (b 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for bond, a for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> angle, see the Gromacs manual for details).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kankana Bhattacharjee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  06/08/23,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:08:09 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 7:13 PM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok sir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023, 19:00 Christoph Junghans <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 7:11 AM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok sir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If i use CG MD only using gromacs without using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votca, is it possible to do with gromacs 2020 or later 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version? If i don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use iterative methods
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well even the non-iterative methods like Boltzmann
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inversion and Force Matching use tables.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You would have to fit them to a Lennard-Jones form to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use Gromacs 2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023, 18:16 Christoph Junghans <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:35 AM Kankana Bhattacharjee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok sir. What should I do to fix it ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Build VOTCA against gromacs-2019. VOTCA even has an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> option to build its own gromacs (BUILD_OWN_GROMACS).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it true for all iterative methods ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, but of course you can always use lammps to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CG MD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  06/05/23,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 06:05:14 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:04 PM Christoph Junghans <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:17 AM Kankana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhattacharjee <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the Fatal error obtained from inverse.log
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Fatal error:The group cutoff scheme has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed since GROMACS 2020. Please use theVerlet 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cutoff scheme.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is right to use tabulated interactions you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will to use gromacs 2019 (or lammps).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VOTCA also prints a warning about that issue then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you build it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Status of tables in newer gromacs versions here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gitlab.com/gromacs/gromacs/-/issues/1347,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but unfortunately not much has moved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kankana Bhattacharjee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  06/05/23,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 05:46:29 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 5:32 PM Christoph Junghans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023, 23:15 Kankana Bhattacharjee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RDF for A-A, B-B, A-B computed from atomistic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulation using csg_stat tool. Now, I am doing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ibi method. But, error is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming during step 1 like this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Appending to existing logfile inverse.log
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are doing Method: ibi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> step 0 is already done - skipping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doing iteration 1 (dir step_001)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simulation with gromacs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Automatically added 'cutoff-scheme = Group' to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grompp.mdp, tabulated interactions only work with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Group cutoff-scheme!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ##################################################################################################################
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                                    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>               #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # ERROR:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                                    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # critical: 'gmx grompp -n index.ndx -f
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grompp.mdp -p topol.top -o topol.tpr -c conf.gro' 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed                 #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # For details see the logfile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /mnt/c/Users/KANKANA/Downloads/votca/csg-tutorials/propane/ibi-kankana/inverse.log
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please look up and post the detailed error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message from inverse.log.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                                    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>               #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ##################################################################################################################
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Terminated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kindly help me with this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kankana Bhattacharjee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  06/05/23,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10:44:51 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 8:42 PM Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Junghans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 9:00 AM Kankana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you sir. But IBI would be for multiple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propane molecules. Isn't it ? It won't be for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> single propane i think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, IBI (and IMC and RE) are for multiple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> molecules.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023, 19:47 Christoph Junghans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 3:16 AM Kankana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir, i performed atomistic simulation of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> single  propane in vaccum. But, if we use 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple propane simulation in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vaccum, then csg_stat can give RDF which can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be compared with RDF of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ibi/imc methods ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The single molecule in vacuum is a common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separation strategy to determine the intertra 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> molecular interactions. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> short get the bonded interactions from BI for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the single chain run and then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run IBI for the non-bonded interactions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the Tschoep paper from 1998 (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.votca.org/csg/bibliography.html#tschoep-1998
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to know how to choose which method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ibi, imc) would be accurate to give accurate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> structural properties?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That depends on the system. IBI, IMC & Re
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are all structure-based methods and try to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce the structure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usually IBI is more robust, but needs more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterations. But IMC converges faster, but needs 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> longer iterations. Marvin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (who is on the mailing list as well) wrote an 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting paper about that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recently:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00665
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023, 09:48 Kankana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir, actually it was given by professor so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that, for any arbitrary molecule also I can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make itp file to run CG-MD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulation. It is just for my learning 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose, in the tutorial for CG systems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> topol.top file is there. Like for ibi, imc 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method etc. topol.top is there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But, for any unknown organic CG molecule how 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can one generate itp file to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run CGMD simulation ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  06/03/23,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 09:45:05 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 9:42 AM Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Junghans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 21:00 Kankana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually sir, it was asked me to prepare
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propane.itp (for CG).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, can you explain a bit more why you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need an itp file? All the files (except for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the potentials) are in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tutorial already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  06/03/23,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 08:29:51 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 4:15 AM Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Junghans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 12:34 PM Kankana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have done boltzmann inversion of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propane. now, for getting nonbonded 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters what protocol should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follow ? Because, my aim is to generate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GROMACS compatible itp file for CG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propane so that, can perform CG-MD using 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Votca.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why can't you use the topology files
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the propane tutorial?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/votca/votca/tree/master/csg-tutorials/propane/ibi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am asking because most of the CG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methods VOTCA implement work on tabulated 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> potentials only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kankana Bhattacharjee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  06/03/23,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12:00:35 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 9:13 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Forgot to CC the mailing list, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here is the answer for others.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Christoph Junghans <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 8:22 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [votca]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding-Getting-itp-files:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 8:06 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir, after boltzmann inversion,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bond.dist.ib, angle.dist.ib and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bond.pot.ib, angle.pot.ib (after using 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tab
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command)files generated. So, where will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get sigma, epsilon values
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not a 100% sure what you mean.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When you use nbfunc=1 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comb-rule=1, the sigma and epsilon 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> column in the atomtypes block are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually the C6 and C12 parameters (i.e. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the prefactor of 1/r**6 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/r**12).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if you then use tables (vdwtype =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user in the mdp file), 1/r**6 and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/r**12 gets replaced with the function
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from files you provided (e.g. obtained 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by boltzmann inversion) And hence in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VOTCA we just set C6=C12=1, so that the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> table is used unmodified.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

-- 
Join us on Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/votca/signup
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/CAHG27e6QA0z_dt5NUxwhqAx7LG9fymnw%2BR70RRiUXtQURW271Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to