On Tue 27 Mar 01, 1:06 PM, Micah Cowan said: > > They did not create the problem again, you're now arguing with the author of the ext2 file system: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9912.3/0042.html > If they had changed the fseek() and ftell() prototypes, they would've > broken an awful lot of code. What would you have done? They did the > only thing which I can see them doing - leave fseek() and ftell() > alone, but offer in addition more forward-thinking alternatives. which doesn't help the 2GB limit because of legacy code. pete
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large File Support Micah Cowan
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large File Support Peter Jay Salzman
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large File Support Micah Cowan
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large File Support Peter Jay Salzman
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large File Sup... jdnewmil
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large Fil... Peter Jay Salzman
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large... Micah Cowan
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large... jdnewmil
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large... jdnewmil
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large File Sup... Micah Cowan
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large Fil... Peter Jay Salzman
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] Large... Micah Cowan
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: [vox] L... Peter Jay Salzman
