>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:15:03 -0400, Hai Yi <yihai2...@gmail.com> said:
HY> Aslo, with regard to QT v.s. GTK, do we have a reason to prefer to one HY> over the other? IMHO, I think Qt is a really good choice lately and I've been looking at it more and more for common portable solutions. It's now ported to nearly every platform (it even has alpha/beta ports to android and iphone, though I don't know how well they work). I recently took the Qt dive and wrote a mail-folder checking application using Qt and made it work on my desktop pretty quickly. I took the code and ran "make" for my phone environment and it compiled without any required modifications, I shipped the binary over to the phone and it ran just fine! (Later releases of Qt (4.6+) are much better on small mobile devices, but it worked under 4.5 originally and the 4.6 upgrade on the phone just made it work that much better). In short: I've been really impressed with Qt. I've used WxWidgets in the past, and it's programming model is one I understand and have written applications for. I've done a bit of work with GTK+ applications and though I can do it, I'm not really a fan of how you need to get things done under GTK+. By far the fastest time-to-running-code of the three that I've played with is Qt and it's by far the most portable, IMHO, as well. -- Wes Hardaker My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/ My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/ _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
