It looks like all those links I created to /rw/whatever should now be created to /lib/init/rw. Am I correct? Because even that tar command in /etc/init.d/voyage-sync which moves stuff from /ro now moves it to /lib/init/rw instead of /rw.
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: Voy User > Sent: 01/05/11 12:01 PM > Subject: Re: [Voyage-linux] 'ro' changes in version .5 onwards > > Thank you. > Few more questions. > > In 0.3.1 image, > there were several files in /etc/ like /etc/adjtime /etc/issue > which were softlinks to /rw/etc/adjtime /rw/etc/issue. > In 0.6.5, these are actual files. > > Also, /var/log was a soft link to /rw/var/log > In 0.6.5, this is an actual dir. > > /var/lib/logrotate was a link to /rw/var/lib/logrotate > In 0.6.5, this is a link to /lib/init/rw/var/lib/logrotate > > Can someone explain these changes? > Asking because in my customisation of 0.3.1, I had several files/directories > which were links to corresponding files/dirs in /rw > > Now I am confused whether I should do the same thing i.e. (links to files in > /rw) > or should I make it an actual file or link to files in /lib/init/rw? > > Please help. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Punky Tse > > Sent: 12/27/10 02:55 PM > > To: Voy User > > Subject: Re: [Voyage-linux] 'ro' changes in version .5 onwards > > > > It is in /etc/init.d/voyage-sync. > > > > > > On 24/12/2010 19:09, Voy User wrote: > > > This is what I am trying to understand. > > > > > > As per my understanding this is how stuff used to work in 0.3 > > > - Whatever you needed writable was stored in the image itself in > > > /ro. For eg a config file you needed which was supposed to be in > > > /etc/prod/prod.conf - the base version was stored in > > > /ro/etc/prod/prod.conf > > > - /rw was empty in the image > > > - the actual /etc/prod was a soft link to /rw/etc/prod > > > - At boot time, /etc/init.d/mountall.sh has line > > > tar -C /ro -cf - . tar -C /rw -xf - > > > So at booting everying in /ro was copied to the empty /rw > > > directory. > > > > > > Let me know if I am mistaken in my above understanding. > > > > > > In 0.6.5, there isn't any /ro directory in the image. > > > There is an empty /rw. > > > > > > There is no tar line in mountall.sh > > > > > > So how will this work in 0.6.5? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Voyage-linux mailing list [email protected] http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux
