On 09-Apr-99, Vance Lee Schowalter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Apr 1999 17:23:52 +0100 the runes reveal ...

>>> When I try IBrowse 1.22 (an inferior browser)
>>
>>Inferiour? Sure. But at least you get a full working version when you
>pay for
>>it.

>Actually, although I am a registered Voyager user, my demo IBrowse
>better displays HTML, which I use for proofreading my html work. For
>example, I can do tables with background images in each cell, but
>Voyager currently does not support this, so I'm backing up my table
>cells with background colour schemes that Voyager can display. I'm
>looking forward to full-current HTML support in the upcoming Voyager,
>as I use Voyager primarily for speed, which it excels at.

Actually, the commercial version of IBrowse (which I am using) doesn't pay any
attention to table column widths while Voyager does.  This is a slight
annoyance to me.

Thanks for the proxy info.  I'll give that a try even though Miami takes care
of all the proxy stuff for me automatically.
-- 
                           Bohdan "Bo" Lechnowsky
                       Quality Assurance Coordinator
           REBOL Technologies 707-467-8000 (http://www.rebol.com)
          Download the REBOL Messaging Language for all Platforms

Reply via email to