Hello Benny
On 20-Jan-02, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Thursday den 17. January 2002 16:01, you wrote:
>
>>> huh? optimised code doesnt always mean smaller binaries/objects
>> Optimized for SIZE does mean exacly that.
>
> smaller exe does not mean smaller mem requirements when run :-)
no but the patched version does use a few less k.. but you are right in your
statement..
start:
moveq #0,d0
nop ;for utter sillyness
rts
section lame,data_f
ds.b somesillylargevalue :)
end: ?
or so :)
remove the nop for optimisation, and you stil have a rather large program/mem
requirements :)
Regards
buzz
--
<sb>ExoticA - http://exotica.fix.no
_____________________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP
Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE
