Hello Matt, On 2004-07-13, you wrote:
> Catch up? > IBrowse implements the same featureset, almost identical, but with > some things Voyager does better (still.. count the flash plugins > for IBrowse..) and some things IBrowse does better (Javascript > mainly). The flash plugin for Voyager is close to useless these days. IBrowse got more speed and tabs as well, support for datatypes, priority settings for loading background/pictures/picturesize, amissl wich is newer than SSL for Voyager and it displayes more pages (of those that I visit at least) better/like it should look like. > AWeb?! You HAVE to be kidding me. AWeb hasn't changed for 2 years. > All they did was "port" from SAS/C to GCC, and remove ClassAct > includes in favour of Reaction ones (big job!). The improvements > in 3.5 are things that Voyager has had since a very long time > (Regex JS class, double buffered rendering, transparent gifs, > standardised IE-compatible table layout). AWeb has changed. Like you said about the improvments that's what's changed in 2 years in *AWeb* . You're talking against yourself. > Voyager is ALWAYS under development! :) So are the other browsers. Difference is that they get released when they've reached a stable/usable state. /Jörgen
