That fixed the Centos build/verify job, but now the ubuntu1604
build/verify job failed with today's favorite failure signature.
Oh bother...
-daw-
On 05/18/2017 06:09 PM, Dave Wallace wrote:
Rebased. We'll see if that makes any difference.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 05/18/2017 04:37 PM, Florin Coras wrote:
Well, uri.am is a known issue, apparently not the only one ...
As you’ve previously noted, probably the vm is not cleaned up before
the testing and because the suffix (note *vpp1 instead of *vpp3) is
older Centos refuses to do our bidding. Can you try a rebase to pick
up 6745 and the vpp3 suffix?
Florin
On May 18, 2017, at 12:51 PM, Dave Wallace <dwallac...@gmail.com
<mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Florin,
After reverting the changes to uri.am, I'm still seeing the same
failure signature:
---- %< ----
18:24:18 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp1.x86_64.rpm
18:24:18 ########################################
18:24:19 package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp3.x86_64 (which is
newer than vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp1.x86_64) is already installed
18:24:19 make[1]: *** [install-rpm] Error 2
18:24:19 make[1]: Leaving directory
`/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk'
18:24:19 make: *** [dpdk-install-dev] Error 2
---- %< ----
Thus this failure has nothing to do with the changes made to uri.am
Thanks,
-daw-
On 05/18/2017 08:00 AM, Dave Wallace wrote:
Florin,
I was also curious as to why this failure only happened on centos.
I suspect that the debian package manager is less strict about
allowing a prior version package to be installed than the rpm
package manager. I don't have any experience with the rpm package
manager, and haven't been doing any analysis on the random centos
verify job failures that have been happening. Thus my question for
Tom who has been leading the rpm packaging and centos verification
efforts.
This patch is going to be abandoned anyways, so I'm not that
concerned about resolving the actual verify job failure.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 05/18/2017 12:49 AM, Florin Coras wrote:
Dave,
A quick solution for that problem is to switch uri.am back to
noinst_PROGRAMS.
Still, I’m also curious as to why that fails only for Centos.
HTH,
Florin
On May 17, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Dave Wallace <dwallac...@gmail.com
<mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Tom,
The verify job that builds VPP on Centos7 failed on the patch
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/6672 due to an error installing DPDK:
---- %< ----
00:04:23.601 make[2]: Leaving directory
`/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk'
00:04:23.601 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp1.x86_64.rpm
00:04:23.710 ########################################
00:04:23.778 package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp3.x86_64 (which
is newer than vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp1.x86_64) is already installed
00:04:23.781 make[1]: *** [install-rpm] Error 2
00:04:23.781 make[1]: Leaving directory
`/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk'
00:04:23.782 make: *** [dpdk-install-dev] Error 2
00:04:23.811 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
---- %< ----
Is this a known failure signature?
I think that vpp-verify-master-centos7 should un-install the
vpp-dpdk-dev-*.rpm before the running the build to avoid this
error case. Do you agree?
I wonder if this case shows up because the build minion was
re-used as opposed to being freshly spawned. If that is the
case, then all of the vpp packages that are installed as part of
the verify job should be un-installed after the test build has
completed (i.e. in the teardown phase).
Thanks,
-daw-
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Change in vpp[master]: Build uri_udp_test app
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 23:21:15 +0000
From: fd.io <http://fd.io/> JJB (Code Review) <ger...@fd.io>
Reply-To: jobbuil...@projectrotterdam.info
To: shrinivasan ganapathy <shrinivasanganapa...@gmail.com>
CC: Florin Coras <florin.co...@gmail.com>, Dave Wallace
<dwallac...@gmail.com>, Keith Burns <alaga...@gmail.com>, Ed Kern
<ejkern_st...@mac.com>
fd.io <http://fd.io/> JJB has posted comments on this change.
(https://gerrit.fd.io/r/6672 )
Change subject: Build uri_udp_test app
......................................................................
Patch Set 5: Verified-1
Build Failed
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/5490/ : FAILURE
No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred, please add
a suitable Cause for it.
(https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/5490/ )
Logs:https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-master-centos7/5490
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1604/5495/ : SUCCESS
Logs:https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1604/5495
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/5494/ : SUCCESS
Logs:https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/5494
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-docs-verify-master/4090/ : SUCCESS
Logs:https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-docs-verify-master/4090
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-make-test-docs-verify-master/1818/ : SUCCESS
Logs:https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-make-test-docs-verify-master/1818
--
To view, visithttps://gerrit.fd.io/r/6672
To unsubscribe, visithttps://gerrit.fd.io/r/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Idbc10e9fab3b4e64feba3fa2490a11bcbc75daca
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Project: vpp
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: shrinivasan ganapathy<shrinivasanganapa...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dave Wallace<dwallac...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ed Kern<ejkern_st...@mac.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Florin Coras<florin.co...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Keith Burns<alaga...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer:fd.io <http://fd.io/> JJB<jobbuil...@projectrotterdam.info>
Gerrit-HasComments: No
_______________________________________________
csit-dev mailing list
csit-...@lists.fd.io <mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
