On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Ole Troan <otr...@employees.org> wrote: > Hi, > > The 'S' in VPP's S-NAT plugin name has often been confused with Linux' > "Source NAT". The 'S' originally stood for "Simple", implying that it was a > less complex implementation of NAT than the previous VCGN implementation. > > Because of this confusion (and possibly valid arguments that it isn't so > simple anymore) we'd like to rename it. > The feature supports all flavours of NAT44 and NAT64. > > The suggested new name is simply NAT. I.e. "VPP NAT". > > The proposal is to change the name in the wiki, documentation, folder/files > and CLI. > I am unsure if it is possible to change the API at this point. We might have > to put in the new message names and allow those to live in parallel with the > old ones for a release or two.
> Does anyone use the SNAT API? Yes! > Opinions? Changing its name would be good. I can track the name changes if you just want to slam them out there. jdl _______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
