Hi, I improved the patch Natalie submitted, and pushed it for review on gerrit: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/12694/ .
There was a small change in dpdk/device/init.c - I needed to set ignore_offload_bitfield manually, don't know what changed since I last tested it, but it did not work without it. I also added stuff for mrvl_pmd in dpdk/Makefile. And fixed the hard coded linker flag to some kind of autotools magic (hope I done it right). Everything was tested on VPP from today morning (not IPsec though). Regards, Szymon 2018-05-17 21:07 GMT+02:00 Damjan Marion <dmarion.li...@gmail.com>: > > Fine if this is going to stay out of vpp repo, as it is duplicate > functionality and also it will make dpdk plugin more messy due to external > dependencies on musdk. > Will be better to do that work with some NIC which have native DPDK > drivers, not wrapper like in musdk case... > > -- > Damjan > > On 17 May 2018, at 14:09, Nitin Saxena <nitin.sax...@cavium.com> wrote: > > Hi Damjan, > > This request was discussed in FD.io ARM call in order to optimize > dpdk-input node for ARM platforms. Macchiatobin is one common platform > where almost all ARM stakeholders are working on and profiling data/details > can be easily shared among them. > > Thanks, > Nitin > > On Wednesday 16 May 2018 11:37 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: > > Hi Natalie, > Who requested that? > Thanks, > -- > Damjan > > On 16 May 2018, at 15:33, Natalie Samsonov <nsams...@marvell.com < > mailto:nsams...@marvell.com <nsams...@marvell.com>>> wrote: > > Dear Damjan, > As I understood, it was a request to use DPDK plugin with all platforms > and I was asked to upstream Marvell DPDK plugin. > Best Regards, > Natalie > *From:*Damjan Marion [mailto:dmarion.li...@gmail.com > <dmarion.li...@gmail.com>] > *Sent:*Wednesday, May 16, 2018 16:03 > *To:*Natalie Samsonov <nsams...@marvell.com <mailto:nsams...@marvell.com > <nsams...@marvell.com>>> > *Cc:*Tina Tsou <tina.t...@arm.com <mailto:tina.t...@arm.com > <tina.t...@arm.com>>>;vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>; Maen Suleiman <m...@marvell.com < > mailto:m...@marvell.com <m...@marvell.com>>> > *Subject:*[EXT] Re: [vpp-dev] Marvell's AI from last call > External Email > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dear Natalie, > What is the point of using DPDK marvel driver (which is actually just a > wrapper around musdk) if we already have native musdk support in vpp? > -- > Damjan > > > On 15 May 2018, at 08:48, Natalie Samsonov <nsams...@marvell.com > <mailto:nsams...@marvell.com <nsams...@marvell.com>>> wrote: > Hi, > 1.We are working now on upstreaming Marvell’s PMD support in VPP > DPDK plugin. > I’m attaching the patch as well in case you want play with it. > 2.Regarding the L3FWD performance difference between MUSDK and > DPDK, currently we don’t have numbers with VPP L3FW. > We only have the numbers with two different applications. One is > our own L3FW application running on top of MUSDK and other is a > standard DPDL L3FWD application, so it’s not a fair comparison. > Best Regards, > Natalie Samsonov > <0001-plugins-dpdk-Add-support-for-net_mrvl-dpdk-driver.patch> > > > > >
