You'll be glad to hear that it did, indeed, clear Coverity up. :) Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Benoit Ganne (bganne) <bga...@cisco.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 12:32 To: Luke, Chris <chris_l...@cable.comcast.com>; Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [vpp-dev] Coverity run FAILED as of 2019-10-22 14:00:19 UTC > Redefine the macro for the Coverity case, so Coverity doesn't > complain. It just needs to be representative of the execution you expect to > happen. Ha yes good point, I was focusing on the ASSERT()... Just did that: https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=52707044-0e947e8f-527057f0-000babff3540-a375f8b76a951681&u=https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/22936 Hopefully, Coverity should remove the false positives with that. Thx ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14281): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14281 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/36443369/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
