Hi Neale,

When originally designing this, I opted in for `mktemp` as that’s the usual way 
to avoid clashes as at that time I assumed that this might be used on boxes 
where there are multiple users and they might like to run tests in parallel. At 
that time I didn’t expect issues like multiple vpps causing problems and it all 
kinda stuck.

The way I deal with this is using `less /tmp/vpp-unittest-*/log.txt’ (which 
lately requires SANITY=no as it tends to pick log.txt from sanity run). For 
core I use DEBUG=core which gives me gdb without having to think about any of 
the paths.

Having said all that, I don’t see any reason to keep random names. I’m not 
aware of any issues this change my cause…

Regards,
Klement

> On 17 Mar 2020, at 17:56, Neale Ranns via Lists.Fd.Io 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Am I the only one who finds the use of random directories for the unit-tests 
> an unnecessary annoyance?
> 
> I would suggest that random names are not needed for security purposes, since 
> these files do not exist on a field system. Also, all directories are wiped 
> before the next test run so it can't be to support saving runs nor multiple 
> users.
> 
> I find it annoying because I can't just reload log.txt or core in my editor 
> or debugger.
> 
> It's a simple change if there's consensus, or you can just call me and old 
> grump and we can all move on __
> 
> /neale
> 
> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15806): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/15806
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/72029031/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to