From: Liam Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I like option a; I think that using the LSM framework is the best way to >go, and ensures that you have a whole lot less work in the future -> >instead of patching in a vserver framework, instead you have a more >established API that will be less of a moving target to develop against.
Does anyone know where the LSM framework is sufficient to implement vserver? The grsecurity patches, for instance, don't use LSM because it isn't flexible enough. -- Tim Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG public key fingerprint ECDF 46F8 3B80 BB9E 575D 7180 76DF FE00 34B1 5C78 _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
