On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:25:50PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > Hi Community! > > > 1) should the 2.4 branch be frozen, and if when? yes, unless someone else wants to take mainteinership. When? i think not before 2.6.8, when the 2.6 branch will be more stable Some features like virtual networtking, will be nice if were available even for 2.4
> 2) is it bad if 2.4 and 2.6 branches diverge? Not so much, 2.6 is much better for vserver stuffs because the "big macchines" features > 3) is multitude (2.4/2.6/2.6SE) preferred over > development speed? No, i think stability and features are the top priorities, after all, people using vserver are all expert sysadmins , aren't? > 4) is a 2.4/2.6 migration path important to you? yes > 5) what branch 2.4, 2.6 or 2.6SE would you prefer? 2.6 , not sure about LSM, i dnt know if it have all the hooks for supporting vserver, and however maybe things will be too much complicated. I have the impression LSM will be rewritten/severely extended in the future. > 6) what branch/version do you currently use/test? > 1.3.6 testing on i386 1.24 in production onn i386 1.24 in testing on sparc64 Thanks for all your wonderful work Stefano _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
