On Wednesday 11 August 2004 19:01, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:53:48PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 August 2004 18:19, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > oops, spoken too fast ... a few minutes after that > > > we managed to spot a permission issue which should > > > now be fixed in rc2 ... > > > > Thanks, maybe advertise it as stable release candiate > > on the vserver homepage and keep it out for one or two weeks? > > hmm, would be an option, Community, what is > your opinion on that?
good idea! the release process should be like this: alpha's -> beta's -> rc's -> releases > TIA, > Herbert > > > The 2.4.27 kernel lasted a long time to release, too. > > > > I wouldn't have a problem if the stable vserver patches need some time > > till declared stable, but I hate to upgrade running machines because > > there are always some people which want to know why this was necessary. > > > > -- > > lg, Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > Vserver mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- regards, Georges Toth _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
