This thread actually brings up a good question I've
been meaning to ask.  I've set of several vserver
machines with several dozen guests, all on a RH9 base:

kernel-2.4.22ctx-17c
kernel-2.4.25-vs1.26
kernel-2.4.26-vs1.28smp

I've now been looking to make a switch for my host OS.
 I was less than impressed with Fedora Core 1 and 2,
but have been quite pleased with Fedora Core 3, at
least on the desktop.   And since it does have a 2.6
series kernel, I'm contemplating switching to it.  But
I'd rather wait for the platform to completely stable
before moving.  I'd rather not be changing/upgrading
every week. I'd also like to transparently move my
existing vserver guests.  I am RH/Fedora leaning. 
Where are others going with their 2.6 installations,
especially those wanting to be on the "trailing" edge?

Thanks,

Eric






--- Tomas Fasth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Talking about uptime and stability; The following is
> an old 
> installation of ours still serving customers;
> 
> serverhost$ uname -rvm
> 2.4.20-mppe+ctx+xfs+vlan-k7 #1 Mon Sep 15 11:18:51
> CEST 2003 i686
> serverhost$ echo $(uptime) # getting rid of double
> spaces
> 15:07:55 up 490 days, 8:24, 1 user, load average:
> 0.02, 0.03, 0.00
> serverhost$ sudo vserver-stat | expr $(wc -l) - 2
> 32
> 
> Well, not much of a load for the moment. But still
> ... ;)
> 
> // Tomas
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> [email protected]
>
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> 

_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Reply via email to