On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:41:58PM +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote: > how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a > production envoirnment.
it seems to be at least as stable as the 2.6 branch of the kernel > If it is not very stable, would the > instability affect the vservers or the main server. instability affects the entire host, as with all other solutions > In my case I have > a large site that would benefit if some of the services on it is in a > vserver, so I can have the main site on the main server and some less > important services on vservers if the instability is only in the > vservers. there is no known instability, otherwise we would fix it ;) HTH, Herbert > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis > Paulisch > Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem > > Hi, > i used the Kernel 2.6.10 and Patch before.. this worked nice. > But now i upgraded my Kernel to the latest Version with the new > vServer Patch on Kernel 2.6.11.5. > I also installed the latest Util-vServer... > Now when i try to enter my vserver i got this Problem.... > society:~/img # vserver test enter > WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method > //lib/util-vserver/legacy/vserver: line 699: ulimit: max user > processes: cannot modify limit: Das Argument ist ung�ltig > ipv4root is now 192.168.1.151 > chcontext: vc_new_s_context(): Invalid argument > society:~/img # > What should i do? Downgrade? > I hope any1 can help me. > greetz Dennis > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
