Matt Ayres wrote:
Mike Schneider wrote:
as most of you will know, we had a booth a Linuxtag 2006 which
took place in Wiesbaden from May 3rd to 6th. Kudos go to DerJohn who
organized the whole thing.

At the booth we had some servers running VServer in a 19'' rack and
a multi-seat workstation which had the individual seats running inside
it's own VServer each.

I'm glad to hear things went over well. How was the response to Linux VServer versus the other virtualisation technologies out there? This seems to be the first large demonstration of this project to the general public and I am curious (as I'm sure some others are too).

A question that was asked a lot was
'what is the difference to [Xen|UML|VMware|...]'
I need not answer this question on this list. We were able to
distinguish ourselves and got a lot of people interested enough
to say they'll try it out.

A point that we could almost always drive home is that VServer
distiguishes itself from other solutions in being so simplicistic
and always on top of new kernel development that it can easily be
combined with other applications:
 - combination with drbd to gain failover
 - combination with multi-seat technology to gain hardened multi-seat
   servers

Also, this web interface... any details?  Website?

Sorry, can't say none about that. I met the guy who's writing it
and I hope he'll read this and come forward.

Regards,
Mike Schneider
--
------------------------------------------------------
Dipl. Inform. Mike Schneider
IT Systems Management Associate
IT-Systems Management Division
Fraunhofer IPSI
Dolivostrasse 15, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
Phone: +49 6151 869-845, Fax: +49 6151 869-819
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ipsi.fraunhofer.de/~mikeschneider
------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Reply via email to